» Articles » PMID: 35694429

The Effect of Transportation and Wildfires on the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of PM Mass in the New York-New Jersey Metropolitan Statistical Area

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2022 Jun 13
PMID 35694429
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Declining ambient PM concentrations have been attributed to fuel consumption standards and emission controls of secondary sulfate and nitrate aerosol precursors from transportation and industrial sectors. As a result, the relative contribution of PM sources is modified, shifting PM trends, physicochemical characteristics, and health effects. Carbonaceous fine aerosol account for most of PM mass in the US. This study aims to examine the spatiotemporal trends of ambient PM levels and their association with primary PM emissions from anthropogenic activities and fires in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan statistical area (NYNJ MSA) airshed. PM mass concentrations were obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Air Data. Ambient PM mass levels declined on average by 47%, at a rate of -0.61 ± 0.01 μg/m/year in urban locations and -0.25 ± 0.01 μg/m/year in upwind and peri-urban locations over the 2007 to 2017 period. The strong spatial gradient in 2007, with high PM levels in urban locations and low PM levels in peri-urban locations gradually weakened by 2013 but re-appeared in 2017. Over the same period, primary PM emissions declined by 52% from transportation, 15% from industrial, and 8% from other anthropogenic sources corresponding to a decrease of 0.8, 0.9, and 0.6 μg/m on ambient PM mass, respectively. Wildland and prescribed fires emissions increased more than 3 times adding 0.8 μg/m to ambient PM mass. These results indicate that (i) fire emissions may impede the effectiveness of existing policies to improve air quality and (ii) the chemical content of PM may be changing to an evolving mixture of aromatic and oxygenated organic species with differential toxicological responses as compared to inert ammonium sulfate and nitrate salts.

References
1.
Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer F, Dockery D . Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173(6):667-72. PMC: 2662950. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC. View

2.
Parker J, Kravets N, Vaidyanathan A . Particulate Matter Air Pollution Exposure and Heart Disease Mortality Risks by Race and Ethnicity in the United States: 1997 to 2009 National Health Interview Survey With Mortality Follow-Up Through 2011. Circulation. 2017; 137(16):1688-1697. PMC: 5908251. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029376. View

3.
Oberdorster G . Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001; 74(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004200000185. View

4.
Chalbot M, Chitranshi P, Gamboa da Costa G, Pollock E, Kavouras I . Characterization of water-soluble organic matter in urban aerosol by H-NMR spectroscopy. Atmos Environ (1994). 2016; 128(March 2016):235-245. PMC: 4905722. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.067. View

5.
Pope 3rd C, Dockery D . Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006; 56(6):709-42. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485. View