» Articles » PMID: 30344445

Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter in 2025

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 23
PMID 30344445
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The contribution of precursor emissions from 17 mobile source sectors to ambient ozone and fine particulate matter levels across the U.S. were evaluated, using the CAMx photochemical model, to identify which mobile source sectors are projected to have the largest impacts on air pollution in 2025. Both onroad and nonroad sectors contribute considerably to projected air pollution across much of the country. Summer ozone season ozone contributions between 2 and 5 ppb, which are among the highest levels presented on the maps of mobile source sectors, are largely found in the southeast United States from the onroad sectors, most notably light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and along the coastline from the Category 3 (C3) marine sector. Annual average PM contributions between 0.5 to 0.9 μg/m, which are among the highest levels presented on the maps of mobile source sectors, are found throughout the Midwest and along portions of the east and west coast from onroad sectors as well as nonroad diesel and rail sectors. Additionally, contributions of precursor emissions to ambient ozone and PM levels were evaluated to understand the range of impacts from precursors in the various mobile source sectors. For most mobile source sectors, in most locations, NO emissions contributed more to ozone than VOC emissions, and secondary PM contributed more to ambient PM than primary PM. The largest ozone levels on the maps showing contributions from mobile source NO emissions tended to be between 2 and 5 ppb, while the largest ozone levels on the maps showing contributions from mobile source VOC emissions tended to be between 0.9 and 2 ppb, except for southern California where ozone contributions from VOC emissions from onroad light duty vehicles were between 2 and 5 ppb. The largest contributions to ambient PM on the maps showing primary and secondary contributions from mobile source sectors tended to be between 0.1 and 0.5 μg/m. The contribution from primary PM extended over localized areas (urban-scale) and the contribution from secondary PM extended over more regional (multi-state) areas.

Citing Articles

Quantifying NO Emission Sources in Houston, Texas Using Remote Sensing Aircraft Measurements and Source Apportionment Regression Models.

Goldberg D, de Foy B, Nawaz M, Johnson J, Yarwood G, Judd L ACS EST Air. 2024; 1(11):1391-1401.

PMID: 39539465 PMC: 11555634. DOI: 10.1021/acsestair.4c00097.


Evaluating reduced-form modeling tools for simulating ozone and PM monetized health impacts.

Simon H, Baker K, Sellers J, Amend M, Penn S, Bankert J Environ Sci Atmos. 2023; 19(227):1-13.

PMID: 37590244 PMC: 10425884. DOI: 10.1039/d3ea00092c.


A hyperlocal hybrid data fusion near-road PM2.5 and NO2 annual risk and environmental justice assessment across the United States.

Valencia A, Serre M, Arunachalam S PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0286406.

PMID: 37262039 PMC: 10234552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286406.


A Source Apportionment and Emission Scenario Assessment of PM- and O-Related Health Impacts in G20 Countries.

Nawaz M, Henze D, Anenberg S, Braun C, Miller J, Pronk E Geohealth. 2023; 7(1):e2022GH000713.

PMID: 36618583 PMC: 9811479. DOI: 10.1029/2022GH000713.


The Effect of Transportation and Wildfires on the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of PM Mass in the New York-New Jersey Metropolitan Statistical Area.

Singh S, Johnson G, Kavouras I Environ Health Insights. 2022; 16:11786302221104016.

PMID: 35694429 PMC: 9179005. DOI: 10.1177/11786302221104016.


References
1.
West J, Cohen A, Dentener F, Brunekreef B, Zhu T, Armstrong B . "What We Breathe Impacts Our Health: Improving Understanding of the Link between Air Pollution and Health". Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50(10):4895-904. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03827. View

2.
Collet S, Kidokoro T, Karamchandani P, Shah T, Jung J . Future-year ozone prediction for the United States using updated models and inputs. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017; 67(8):938-948. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2017.1310149. View

3.
Fann N, Lamson A, Anenberg S, Wesson K, Risley D, Hubbell B . Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Anal. 2011; 32(1):81-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01630.x. View

4.
Koo B, Wilson G, Morris R, Dunker A, Yarwood G . Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air duality model. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(17):6669-75. DOI: 10.1021/es9008129. View

5.
Wolfe G, Kaiser J, Hanisco T, Keutsch F, de Gouw J, Gilman J . Formaldehyde production from isoprene oxidation across NO regimes. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018; 16(4):2597-2610. PMC: 5879783. DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-2597-2016. View