Population-Based Prevalence of Infarctions on 3D Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Imaging
Overview
Neurology
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To report population-based, age-specific prevalence of infarctions as identified via 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging.
Materials And Methods: Participants without dementia in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA), a population-based study in Olmsted County, MN, age 50-89 who underwent 3D FLAIR imaging between 2017 and 2020 were included. Infarctions per participant were determined via visual interpretation. Inter- and intra-reader reliability were calculated. Infarction prevalence on 3D FLAIR was derived by standardization to the Olmsted County population and was compared to that previously reported on 2D FLAIR imaging.
Results: Among 580 participants (mean age 71 years, 46% female) the prevalence (95% confidence interval) of any infarction was 5.0% (0.0%-9.9%) at age 50-59 years and 38.8% (28.6%-49.0%) at 80-89 years. In addition to increasing with age, the prevalence varied by sex and type of infarction. Prevalence estimates of cortical infarcts were 0.9% (0.0%-2.7%) at age 50-59 years and 20.2% (10.7%-29.7%) at 80-89 years and lacunar infarcts 4.1% (0.0%-8.8%) at age 50-59 years and 31.2% (21.5%-41.0%) at 80-89 years. Prevalence estimates of any infarction by sex were: men, 8.7% (0.0%-18.7%) at 50-59 years and 54.9% (41.0%-68.8%) at 80-89 years and women, 2.4% (0.0%-7.3%) at age 50-59 years and 27.3% (12.9%-41.7%) at 80-89 years. Intra- and inter- reader reliability were very good (kappa = 0.85 and 0.82, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex and education, individuals imaged with 3D FLAIR were 1.5 times (95% CI 1.2-1.8, p<0.001) more likely to be identified as positive for infarction compared to those imaged with 2D FLAIR.
Conclusions: Infarction prevalence increases with age and is greater in men than women. Infarction prevalence on 3D FLAIR imaging, which has become more widely implemented as an alternative to 2D FLAIR over the past several years, will be a useful reference in future work.
Boots E, Frank R, Fan W, Christianson T, Kremers W, Stricker J J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024; 11(5):1467-1479.
PMID: 39350394 PMC: 11436415. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2024.99.
Vassilaki M, Syrjanen J, Krell-Roesch J, Graff-Radford J, Vemuri P, Scharf E J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023; 7(1):1237-1246.
PMID: 38025797 PMC: 10657723. DOI: 10.3233/ADR-230073.
Eligibility for Anti-Amyloid Treatment in a Population-Based Study of Cognitive Aging.
Pittock R, Aakre J, Castillo A, Ramanan V, Kremers W, Jack Jr C Neurology. 2023; 101(19):e1837-e1849.
PMID: 37586881 PMC: 10663008. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207770.
Beba A, Peterson S, Brennan P, OByrne J, Machulda M, Jannetto P J Alzheimers Dis. 2023; 94(4):1335-1342.
PMID: 37393495 PMC: 10481381. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-221182.
OCearbhaill R, Haughey A, Willinsky R, Farb R, Nicholson P Neuroradiology. 2023; 65(5):893-898.
PMID: 36781427 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03128-7.