» Articles » PMID: 35676858

Proxy-report in Individuals with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 9
PMID 35676858
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Views can be collected from individuals (self-report) or others on their behalf (proxy-report).

Objective: We aimed to review the literature on methods and statistical approaches used to evaluate observer versus self-report responses from individuals with intellectual disability or Down syndrome.

Methods: A series of key questions related to statistical approaches and data collection methods were formulated a priori to inform the search strategy and review process. These addressed the topics of self-report in individuals with intellectual disability, including Down syndrome. Using the National Library of Medicine database, PubMed, detailed literature searches were performed. The quality of available evidence was then evaluated, the existing literature was summarised, and knowledge gaps and research needs were identified.

Results: Fifty relevant original articles were identified which addressed at least one key question. Study details, including: research design, internal validity, external validity, and relevant results are presented. Review of studies of individuals with intellectual disability which used a variety of statistical approaches showed mixed agreement between self-report and proxy-report.

Conclusion: Few studies identified to-date have used self-report from individuals with Down syndrome, but lessons from the existing intellectual disability literature can guide researchers to incorporate self-report from individuals with Down syndrome in the future.

Citing Articles

Proxy reporting in health: a scoping review of instructions, perspectives, and reporting experiences.

Dagne H, Doherty K, Campbell J, Saul A, Roydhouse J Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40011354 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03929-8.


A Systematic Review of Community-Based Exercise Interventions for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.

Greene T, Taggart L, Breslin G Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942488 PMC: 11817475. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030299.


Daily functioning and (health-related) quality of life of young adult survivors of childhood bacterial meningitis.

Tahir O, de Jonge R, Pronk J, Goei S, Terwee C, van Furth A Eur J Pediatr. 2024; 183(12):5441-5453.

PMID: 39424640 PMC: 11527968. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05819-6.


Agreement between patient- and proxy-reported outcome measures in adult musculoskeletal trauma and injury: a scoping review.

Raats J, Ponds N, Brameier D, Bain P, Schuijt H, van der Velde D Qual Life Res. 2024; 34(1):89-99.

PMID: 39179941 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03766-1.


Developing a Measure of Key Adult Outcomes in Adults with Developmental Disabilities: Conceptual Model and Item Generation of the REALS (Relationships, Employment, Autonomy, and Life Satisfaction).

MacKenzie K, Beck K, Eack S, Zeglen K, Conner C, Mazefsky C J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; 55(2):428-439.

PMID: 38291244 PMC: 11286834. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-06219-9.


References
1.
Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G . How well do parents know their children? Implications for proxy reporting of child health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(7):1297-307. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000037480.65972.eb. View

2.
McHugh M . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22(3):276-82. PMC: 3900052. View

3.
Miller S, Chan F . Predictors of life satisfaction in individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008; 52(12):1039-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01106.x. View

4.
Balboni G, Coscarelli A, Giunti G, Schalock R . The assessment of the quality of life of adults with intellectual disability: the use of self-report and report of others assessment strategies. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34(11):4248-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.009. View

5.
Becker E, Dusing S . Participation is possible: A case report of integration into a community performing arts program. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010; 26(4):275-80. DOI: 10.3109/09593980903423137. View