The Association Between Vitamin D Status and COVID-19 in England: A Cohort Study Using UK Biobank
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Recent studies indicate that vitamin D supplementation may decrease respiratory tract infections, but the association between vitamin D and COVID-19 is still unclear.
Objective: To explore the association between vitamin D status and infections, hospitalisation, and mortality due to COVID-19.
Methods: We used UK Biobank, a nationwide cohort of 500,000 individuals aged between 40 and 69 years at recruitment between 2006 and 2010. We included people with at least one serum vitamin D test, living in England with linked primary care and inpatient records. The primary exposure was serum vitamin D status measured at recruitment, defined as deficiency at <25 nmol/L, insufficiency at 25-49 nmol/L and sufficiency at ≥ 50 nmol/L. Secondary exposures were self-reported or prescribed vitamin D supplements. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed or clinically diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections. The secondary outcomes included hospitalisation and mortality due to COVID-19. We used multivariable Cox regression models stratified by summertime months and non-summertime months, adjusting for demographic factors and underlying comorbidities.
Results: We included 307,512 participants (54.9% female, 55.9% over 70 years old) in our analysis. During summertime months, weak evidence existed that the vitamin D deficiency group had a lower hazard of being diagnosed with COVID-19 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-0.95). During non-summertime, the vitamin D deficiency group had a higher hazard of COVID-19 compared with the vitamin D sufficient group (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01-1.30). No evidence was found that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency was associated with either hospitalisation or mortality due to COVID-19 in any time strata.
Conclusion: We found no evidence of an association between historical vitamin D status and hospitalisation or mortality due to COVID-19, along with inconsistent results for any association between vitamin D and diagnosis of COVID-19. However, studies using more recent vitamin D measurements and systematic COVID-19 testing are needed.
Brinduse L, Eclemea I, Neculau A, Cucu M Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).
PMID: 38542778 PMC: 10975605. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060867.
The bounds of meta-analytics and an alternative method.
Shanmugam R, Tabatabai M, Wilus D, Singh K Epidemiol Health. 2024; 46:e2024016.
PMID: 38228087 PMC: 11040225. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2024016.
A systematic review: The relationship of COVID-19 to iron, zinc, and vitamin D.
Alsharif M, Alyousef R, Alturki A, Kofi M J Family Med Prim Care. 2023; 12(10):2392-2400.
PMID: 38074276 PMC: 10706502. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2460_22.
Alvarez M, Jimenez G, Anguita Sanchez N, Del Mar Bermejo Olano M, Queipo R, Benavent Nunez M PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0277388.
PMID: 37682843 PMC: 10490842. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277388.
Vitamin D, Menopausal Health and COVID-19: Critical Appraisal of Current Data.
Anagnostis P, Livadas S, Goulis D, Rees M, Lambrinoudaki I J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).
PMID: 36769563 PMC: 9917790. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030916.