Distribution of Vitamin D Status in the UK: a Cross-sectional Analysis of UK Biobank
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: No recent large studies have described the distribution of vitamin D status in the UK. Understanding the epidemiology of vitamin D deficiency is important to inform targeted public health recommendations. This study aimed to investigate the distribution of factors associated with serum vitamin D status in a large national cohort.
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Setting: The UK Biobank, a prospective cohort study following the health and well-being of middle-aged and older adults recruited between 2006 and 2010.
Participants: A total of 449 943 participants aged 40-69 years with measured serum vitamin D status were eligible for the analysis. Participants completed a questionnaire about sex, age, ethnic background, vitamin D supplementation, smoking, drinking and socioeconomic status.
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: We investigated the distribution of serum vitamin D status and the association between demographic factors and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level <25 nmol/L. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between demographic factors and vitamin D status.
Results: Asian (n=4297/8000, 53.7%) and black (n=2459/7046, 34.9%) participants had a higher proportion of vitamin D deficiency than white participants (n=50 920/422 907, 12%). During spring and winter, the proportion of vitamin D deficiency was higher across the UK and higher in the north than in the south. Male sex, abnormal body mass index, non-white ethnic backgrounds, smoking and being more socioeconomically deprived were associated with higher odds of vitamin D deficiency. Increasing age, taking vitamin D supplements and drinking alcohol were associated with lower odds of deficiency.
Conclusions: Vitamin D status varied among different ethnic groups and by season and geographical area within the UK. Taking supplements was associated with a lower risk of vitamin D deficiency. These findings support the vitamin D supplementation recommendations of Public Health England.
Jenssen M, Arora N, Loset M, Asvold B, Thomas L, Bekkevold Vassmyr O JID Innov. 2025; 5(2):100336.
PMID: 39968369 PMC: 11833344. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100336.
Mahmud M, Muscatello D, Rahman M, Osborne N Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(9):1573-1584.
PMID: 38806788 PMC: 11364661. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07115-3.
Kherati R, Bansal A, Oleksiewicz J, Kadir A, Burgess N, Barr S JPGN Rep. 2024; 5(1):17-28.
PMID: 38545265 PMC: 10964338. DOI: 10.1002/jpr3.12037.
Brinduse L, Eclemea I, Neculau A, Cucu M Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).
PMID: 38542778 PMC: 10975605. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060867.
The Relationship between Vitamin D Levels and Blood Glucose and Cholesterol Levels.
Elsheikh E, Alabdullah A, Al-Harbi S, Alagha A, AlAhmed D, Alalmaee M Clin Pract. 2024; 14(2):426-435.
PMID: 38525711 PMC: 10961748. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14020032.