» Articles » PMID: 35661931

Evaluation of Bone Depth, Cortical Bone, and Mucosa Thickness of Palatal Posterior Supra-alveolar Insertion Site for Miniscrew Placement

Overview
Journal Prog Orthod
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35661931
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of palatal miniscrew offers the possibility to improve the effectiveness of orthodontic expansion devices. Palatal expanders supported by miniscrew can be applied with different clinical protocols. Some authors proposed the use of four palatal miniscrews during miniscrew-supported palatal expansion to maximize skeletal effects in young adults' treatment. However, bone availability decreases in the posterior paramedian palatal regions, making the positioning of the two-posterior paramedian palatal miniscrews challenging, when it is performed avoiding nasal cavities invasion. Some authors proposed miniscrews insertion in a specific region located laterally to the palatal process of the maxillary bone, and apically relatively to the dento-alveolar process. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone thickness, cortical bone thickness, and mucosae depth of this anatomical site that, in this study, was defined as palatal posterior supra-alveolar insertion site.

Results: The evaluation of bone availability of palatal posterior supra-alveolar insertion site at different antero-posterior levels showed that the maximum amount of total bone thickness was found between the second premolar and the first molar. At this level total bone, thickness is significantly (p < .05) greater compared to the other sagittal sites and it offers on average around 2 mm of extra bone depth for miniscrew placement. Cortical bone thickness is adequate for primary miniscrew stability. Overall, cortical bone thickness considered at different insertion sites showed significant statistically (p < .05) differences. The findings of this study showed that palatal mucosa is particularly thick with average values ranging from 4 to 7 mm, and its extension ultimately affects miniscrew length selection. Palatal mucosa thickness showed no clinically significant differences comparing different sagittal and vertical insertion sites. Data also showed that palatal mucosal thickness slightly significantly increases (p < .05) with the inclination of the insertion axis relative to the occlusal plane. Finally, study findings showed that vertical growth pattern can significantly affect considered outcomes (p < .05).

Conclusions: Palatal posterior supra-alveolar insertion site is an appropriate site for posterior insertion of palatal miniscrews. Considering high anatomical variation preliminary CBCT evaluation is important to achieve optimal miniscrew placement.

Citing Articles

Automatic Segmentation of the Jaws Used in Guided Insertion of Orthodontic Mini Implants to Improve Their Stability and Precision.

David A, Brad S, Rusu L, David O, Samoila C, Leretter M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459446 PMC: 11509293. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101660.


Reliability and safety of miniscrew insertion planning with the use of lateral cephalograms assessed on corresponding cone-beam computer tomography images.

Perinetti G, Primozic J Eur J Orthod. 2024; 46(2).

PMID: 38364325 PMC: 10873694. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae003.


Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults.

Willershausen I, Ehrenfried A, Krautkremer F, Strobel A, Seidel C, Paulsen F Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):55.

PMID: 38157063 PMC: 10756868. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05472-7.


Evaluation of palate-related factors of the effectiveness of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion in late adolescents and adults.

Nie X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Yan S, Men Y, Yu J Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(7):3531-3544.

PMID: 36988823 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-04967-7.

References
1.
Hourfar J, Kanavakis G, Bister D, Schatzle M, Awad L, Nienkemper M . Three dimensional anatomical exploration of the anterior hard palate at the level of the third ruga for the placement of mini-implants--a cone-beam CT study. Eur J Orthod. 2015; 37(6):589-95. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju093. View

2.
Annarumma F, Posadino M, De Mari A, Drago S, Aghazada H, Gravina G . Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion with a bone-borne appliance in young and late adolescent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159(4):e363-e375. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.031. View

3.
Cunha A, Lee H, Issamu Nojima L, da Cunha Goncalves Nojima M, Lee K . Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion for managing arch perimeter in an adult patient. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017; 22(3):97-108. PMC: 5525451. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.097-108.oar. View

4.
Lagravere M, Ling C, Woo J, Harzer W, Major P, Carey J . Transverse, vertical, and anterior-posterior changes between tooth-anchored versus Dresden bone-anchored rapid maxillary expansion 6 months post-expansion: A CBCT randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Orthod. 2020; 18(2):308-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.003. View

5.
Winsauer H, Muchitsch A, Winsauer C, Milnes R, Vlachojannis J, Walter A . The TopJet for routine bodily molar distalization. J Clin Orthod. 2013; 47(2):96-107. View