» Articles » PMID: 32256130

A New Methodology for the Digital Planning of Micro-Implant-Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expansion

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2020 Apr 8
PMID 32256130
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) appliances utilize the skeletal anchorage to expand the maxilla. One type of MARPE device is the Maxillary Skeletal Expander (MSE), which presents four micro-implants with bicortical engagement of the palatal vault and nasal floor. MSE positioning is traditionally planned using dental stone models and 2D headfilms. This approach presents some critical issues, such as the inability to identify the MSE position relative to skeletal structures, and the potential risk of damaging anatomical structures.

Methods: A novel methodology has been developed to plan MSE position using the digital model of dental arches and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). A virtual model of MSE appliance with the four micro-implants was created. After virtual planning, a positioning guide is virtually designed, 3D printed, and utilized to model and weld the MSE supporting arms to the molar bands. The expansion device is then cemented in the patient oral cavity and micro-implants inserted. A clinical case of a 12.9-year-old female patient presenting a Class III malocclusion with transverse and sagittal maxillary deficiency is reported.

Results: The midpalatal suture was opened with a split of 3.06 mm and 2.8 mm at the anterior and posterior nasal spine, respectively. After facemask therapy, the sagittal skeletal relationship was improved, as shown by the increase in ANB, A-Na perpendicular and Wits cephalometric parameters, and the mandibular plane rotated 1.6° clockwise.

Conclusion: The proposed digital methodology represents an advancement in the planning of MSE positioning, compared to the traditional approach. By evaluating the bone morphology of the palate and midface on patient CBCT, the placement of MSE is improved regarding the biomechanics of maxillary expansion and the bone thickness at micro-implants insertion sites. In the present case report, the digital planning was associated with a positive outcome of maxillary expansion and protraction in safety conditions.

Citing Articles

Tooth-Bone-Borne vs Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders on Dentoskeletal Changes.

Echarri-Nicolas J, Gonzalez-Olmo M, Echarri-Lobiondo P, Lagravere M, Romero M J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:1877-1886.

PMID: 38706502 PMC: 11068038. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S433693.


Impact of digital orthodontics on maxillary protraction with implants in children with skeletal class III: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hassan Alzahrani F, Devanna R, Althomali Y, Hassan Felemban N, Manjunath Battepati P, Holenarasipur A Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(2):240-248.

PMID: 38420003 PMC: 10897631. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.013.


Dental implant survival in epidermolysis bullosa patients: A systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.

Minervini G, Franco R, Marrapodi M, Giudice A, Cicciu M, Ronsivalle V Heliyon. 2024; 10(2):e24208.

PMID: 38304847 PMC: 10831621. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24208.


Digital workflow for mini-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander fabrication-a case report.

Hsu L, Moon W, Chen S, Chang K BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):887.

PMID: 37985987 PMC: 10659097. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03589-5.


Effect of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of bicortical mini-implants placement site for maxillary skeletal expansion appliances: an in vitro study.

Rodriguez Torres P, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Tzironi G, Gonzalez Menendez H, Lorrio Castro J BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):86.

PMID: 36774459 PMC: 9921661. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02785-7.


References
1.
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M . The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1):124. PMC: 5606018. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0. View

2.
Ludwig B, Glas B, Bowman S, Drescher D, Wilmes B . Miniscrew-supported Class III treatment with the Hybrid RPE Advancer. J Clin Orthod. 2011; 44(9):533-9. View

3.
Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E, Krebs M, Hauschild U, Fortin T . Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1):150. PMC: 5729259. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y. View

4.
Cantarella D, Dominguez-Mompell R, Moschik C, Sfogliano L, Elkenawy I, Pan H . Zygomaticomaxillary modifications in the horizontal plane induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with CBCT images. Prog Orthod. 2018; 19(1):41. PMC: 6196147. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-018-0240-2. View

5.
Hurt A . Digital technology in the orthodontic laboratory. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141(2):245-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.045. View