» Articles » PMID: 35658003

From Affinity Selection to Kinetic Selection in Germinal Centre Modelling

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 3
PMID 35658003
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Affinity maturation is an evolutionary process by which the affinity of antibodies (Abs) against specific antigens (Ags) increases through rounds of B-cell proliferation, somatic hypermutation, and positive selection in germinal centres (GC). The positive selection of B cells depends on affinity, but the underlying mechanisms of affinity discrimination and affinity-based selection are not well understood. It has been suggested that selection in GC depends on both rapid binding of B-cell receptors (BcRs) to Ags which is kinetically favourable and tight binding of BcRs to Ags, which is thermodynamically favourable; however, it has not been shown whether a selection bias for kinetic properties is present in the GC. To investigate the GC selection bias towards rapid and tight binding, we developed an agent-based model of GC and compared the evolution of founder B cells with initially identical low affinities but with different association/dissociation rates for Ag presented by follicular dendritic cells in three Ag collection mechanisms. We compared an Ag collection mechanism based on association/dissociation rates of B-cell interaction with presented Ag, which includes a probabilistic rupture of bonds between the B-cell and Ag (Scenario-1) with a reference scenario based on an affinity-based Ag collection mechanism (Scenario-0). Simulations showed that the mechanism of Ag collection affects the GC dynamics and the GC outputs concerning fast/slow (un)binding of B cells to FDC-presented Ags. In particular, clones with lower dissociation rates outcompete clones with higher association rates in Scenario-1, while remaining B cells from clones with higher association rates reach higher affinities. Accordingly, plasma cell and memory B cell populations were biased towards B-cell clones with lower dissociation rates. Without such probabilistic ruptures during the Ag extraction process (Scenario-2), the selective advantage for clones with very low dissociation rates diminished, and the affinity maturation level of all clones decreased to the reference level.

Citing Articles

ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.

van Kampen A, Mahamune U, Jongejan A, van Schaik B, Balashova D, Lashgari D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8117.

PMID: 39284801 PMC: 11405857. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52446-8.


Mechanical control of antigen detection and discrimination by T and B cell receptors.

Rogers J, Bajur A, Salaita K, Spillane K Biophys J. 2024; 123(15):2234-2255.

PMID: 38794795 PMC: 11331051. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.05.020.

References
1.
Perelson A, Oster G . Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination. J Theor Biol. 1979; 81(4):645-70. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90275-3. View

2.
Merino Tejero E, Lashgari D, Garcia-Valiente R, Gao X, Crauste F, Robert P . Multiscale Modeling of Germinal Center Recapitulates the Temporal Transition From Memory B Cells to Plasma Cells Differentiation as Regulated by Antigen Affinity-Based Tfh Cell Help. Front Immunol. 2021; 11:620716. PMC: 7892951. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.620716. View

3.
Zhang Y, Meyer-Hermann M, George L, Figge M, Khan M, Goodall M . Germinal center B cells govern their own fate via antibody feedback. J Exp Med. 2013; 210(3):457-64. PMC: 3600904. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20120150. View

4.
Reshetova P, van Schaik B, Klarenbeek P, Doorenspleet M, Esveldt R, Tak P . Computational Model Reveals Limited Correlation between Germinal Center B-Cell Subclone Abundancy and Affinity: Implications for Repertoire Sequencing. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:221. PMC: 5337809. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00221. View

5.
Stoddart A, Dykstra M, Brown B, Song W, Pierce S, Brodsky F . Lipid rafts unite signaling cascades with clathrin to regulate BCR internalization. Immunity. 2002; 17(4):451-62. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00416-8. View