» Articles » PMID: 35651377

Model Development of a Novel Robotic Surgery Training Exercise With Electrocautery

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2022 Jun 2
PMID 35651377
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has undergone rapid adoption in general surgery due to features such as three-dimensional visualization, wrist dexterity, improved precision of movement, and operator ergonomics. While many surgical trainees encounter RAS during their residency, robotic skills training programs and curricula vary across institutions and there is broad variation in graduating general surgeons' robotic proficiency levels. Due to a need for a formalized process to achieve competence on the robotic platform, simulation-based training has become instrumental in closing this gap as it provides training in a low-stakes environment while allowing the trainee to improve their psychomotor and basic procedural skills. Several different models of simulation training exist including virtual reality, animal, cadaveric, and inanimate tissue platforms. Each form of training has its own merits and limitations. While virtual reality platforms have been well evaluated for face, content, and construct validity, their initial set-up costs can be as high as $125,000. Similarly, animal and cadaveric models are not only costly but also have ethical considerations that may preclude participation. There is an unmet need in developing high-fidelity, cost-effective simulations for basic videoscopic skills such as cautery use. We developed a cost-effective and high-fidelity inanimate tissue model that incorporates electrocautery. Using a double-layered bowel model secured to a moistened household sponge, this inanimate exercise simulates fundamental skills of robotic surgery such as tissue handling, camera control, suturing, and electrocautery.

Citing Articles

Technical skills simulation in transplant surgery: a systematic review.

Patnaik R, Khan M, Oh T, Yamaguchi S, Fritze D Global Surg Educ. 2023; 1(1):42.

PMID: 38013707 PMC: 9483372. DOI: 10.1007/s44186-022-00028-x.


Intentional enterotomies: validation of a novel robotic surgery training exercise.

Laverty R, Khan M, Patnaik R, Lee C, Leonardo C, Krell R J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2109-2115.

PMID: 37219784 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01625-8.


Simulation in Perioperative Liver Transplant Anesthesia: A Systematic Review.

Oh T, Patnaik R, Buckner J, Krokar L, Ibrahim A, Lovely R Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e25602.

PMID: 35795521 PMC: 9250322. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25602.

References
1.
Summers S, Anderson J, Petzel A, Tarr M, Kenton K . Development and testing of a robotic surgical training curriculum for novice surgeons. J Robot Surg. 2015; 9(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-014-0484-x. View

2.
Raison N, Gavazzi A, Abe T, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P . Virtually Competent: A Comparative Analysis of Virtual Reality and Dry-Lab Robotic Simulation Training. J Endourol. 2020; 34(3):379-384. DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0541. View

3.
Kelly D, Margules A, Kundavaram C, Narins H, Gomella L, Trabulsi E . Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology. 2012; 79(5):1068-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.028. View

4.
Hung A, Zehnder P, Patil M, Cai J, Ng C, Aron M . Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol. 2011; 186(3):1019-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064. View

5.
Sheetz K, Claflin J, Dimick J . Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(1):e1918911. PMC: 6991252. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911. View