» Articles » PMID: 17593434

FLS Simulator Performance Predicts Intraoperative Laparoscopic Skill

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Jun 27
PMID 17593434
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Simulators are being used more and more for teaching and testing laparoscopic skills. However, it has yet to be firmly established that simulator performance reflects operative laparoscopic skill. The study reported here was designed to test the hypothesis that laparoscopic simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill.

Methods: A review of our prospectively maintained database identified 40 subjects who underwent Fundamentals of Lapraoscopic Surgery (FLS) skills testing and objective intraoperative assessments within the same 6-month period. Subjects consisted of 22 novice (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-2), 10 intermediate (PGY 3-4), and 8 experienced (PGY 5, fellows, and attendings) laparoscopic surgeons. Laparoscopic performance was objectively assessed in the operating room using the previously validated Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skill (GOALS). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean FLS scores and mean GOALS scores across experience levels. The relationship between individual FLS scores and GOALS scores was assessed with linear regression analysis. A multivariate analysis evaluated FLS score and surgeon experience as predictors of intraoperative GOALS score. A receiver-operator curve (ROC) was constructed in order to define an FLS cutoff score that predicts intraoperative performance at or above the level of experienced surgeons. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results: Mean FLS scores and mean GOALS scores increased with increasing experience. Individual FLS scores correlated significantly with intraoperative GOALS scores (0.77, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that FLS score is an independent predictor of intraoperative GOALS scores. The ROC identified an FLS cutoff score of 70 with optimal sensitivity (91%) and specificity (86%) for predicting a GOALS score at or above the level of experienced surgeons.

Conclusions: In this study sample, FLS simulator scores were independently predictive of intraoperative laparoscopic performance as measured by GOALS. More precisely, an FLS cutoff score of 70 optimized sensitivity and specificity for expert intraoperative performance. A larger prospective study is justified to validate these findings.

Citing Articles

Study on the application of progressive training method combined with imagery training method in laparoscopic suturing skills training for resident physicians.

Lin W, Yu J, Peng X, Xia J, Huang B, Li R BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):369.

PMID: 40075362 PMC: 11900567. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06928-y.


Multi-center evaluation of the first, low-cost, open source and totally 3D-printed pediatric laparoscopic trainer.

Lubet A, Renaux-Petel M, Marret J, Rod J, Sibert L, Delbreilh L Heliyon. 2025; 10(24):e40550.

PMID: 39759331 PMC: 11697559. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40550.


Simultaneous Remote Laparoscopic Training for Trainees Among Multiple Institutions: Can Remote Coaching Replace On-Site Coaching?.

Baba K, Hozaka Y, Tanabe K, Wada M, Kuroshima N, Takara K Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024; 18(1):e70007.

PMID: 39710494 PMC: 11671229. DOI: 10.1111/ases.70007.


Performance in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery: Does it reflect global rating scales in the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills in porcine laparoscopic surgery?.

Tiong H, So W, Teoh J, Isotani S, Zhu G, Ong T Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(3):443-449.

PMID: 39139525 PMC: 11318409. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.12.002.


Validation of a novel, low-fidelity virtual reality simulator and an artificial intelligence assessment approach for peg transfer laparoscopic training.

Bogar P, Virag M, Bene M, Hardi P, Matuz A, Schlegl A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16702.

PMID: 39030307 PMC: 11271545. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67435-6.


References
1.
Derossis A, Bothwell J, Sigman H, Fried G . The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(9):1117-20. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900796. View

2.
Pandey V, Wolfe J, Liapis C, Bergqvist D . The examination assessment of technical competence in vascular surgery. Br J Surg. 2006; 93(9):1132-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5302. View

3.
Grantcharov T, Kristiansen V, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P . Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(2):146-50. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4407. View

4.
Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, OBrien M, Bansal V, Andersen D . Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002; 236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4. PMC: 1422600. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008. View

5.
Korndorffer Jr J, Stefanidis D, Scott D . Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg. 2006; 191(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.048. View