» Articles » PMID: 35646643

Post-Radiotherapy PET Image Outcome Prediction by Deep Learning Under Biological Model Guidance: A Feasibility Study of Oropharyngeal Cancer Application

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jun 1
PMID 35646643
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a method of biologically guided deep learning for post-radiation FDG-PET image outcome prediction based on pre-radiation images and radiotherapy dose information.

Methods: Based on the classic reaction-diffusion mechanism, a novel biological model was proposed using a partial differential equation that incorporates spatial radiation dose distribution as a patient-specific treatment information variable. A 7-layer encoder-decoder-based convolutional neural network (CNN) was designed and trained to learn the proposed biological model. As such, the model could generate post-radiation FDG-PET image outcome predictions with breakdown biological components for enhanced explainability. The proposed method was developed using 64 oropharyngeal patients with paired FDG-PET studies before and after 20-Gy delivery (2 Gy/day fraction) by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). In a two-branch deep learning execution, the proposed CNN learns specific terms in the biological model from paired FDG-PET images and spatial dose distribution in one branch, and the biological model generates post-20-Gy FDG-PET image prediction in the other branch. As in 2D execution, 718/233/230 axial slices from 38/13/13 patients were used for training/validation/independent test. The prediction image results in test cases were compared with the ground-truth results quantitatively.

Results: The proposed method successfully generated post-20-Gy FDG-PET image outcome prediction with breakdown illustrations of biological model components. Standardized uptake value (SUV) mean values in FDG high-uptake regions of predicted images (2.45 ± 0.25) were similar to ground-truth results (2.51 ± 0.33). In 2D-based Gamma analysis, the median/mean Gamma Index (<1) passing rate of test images was 96.5%/92.8% using the 5%/5 mm criterion; such result was improved to 99.9%/99.6% when 10%/10 mm was adopted.

Conclusion: The developed biologically guided deep learning method achieved post-20-Gy FDG-PET image outcome predictions in good agreement with ground-truth results. With the breakdown biological modeling components, the outcome image predictions could be used in adaptive radiotherapy decision-making to optimize personalized plans for the best outcome in the future.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence across oncology specialties: current applications and emerging tools.

Kang J, Lafata K, Kim E, Yao C, Lin F, Rattay T BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000134.

PMID: 39886165 PMC: 11203066. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000134.


Computational staining of CD3/CD20 positive lymphocytes in human tissues with experimental confirmation in a genetically engineered mouse model.

Li X, Heirman C, Rickard A, Sotolongo G, Castillo R, Adanlawo T Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1451261.

PMID: 39530103 PMC: 11550988. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1451261.


Characterization of arteriosclerosis based on computer-aided measurements of intra-arterial thickness.

Zhou J, Li X, Demeke D, Dinh T, Yang Y, Janowczyk A J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(5):057501.

PMID: 39398866 PMC: 11466048. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.5.057501.


Prediction of radiologic outcome-optimized dose plans and post-treatment magnetic resonance images: A proof-of-concept study in breast cancer brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Pandey S, Kutuk T, Abdalah M, Stringfield O, Ravi H, Mills M Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100602.

PMID: 39040435 PMC: 11261135. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100602.


A Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Brain Positron Emission Tomography Data Analysis.

Xu K, Kang H Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 58(4):203-212.

PMID: 38932757 PMC: 11196571. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-024-00845-6.


References
1.
Hormuth 2nd D, Weis J, Barnes S, Miga M, Quaranta V, Yankeelov T . Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 100(5):1270-1279. PMC: 5934308. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.004. View

2.
Yan D . Adaptive radiotherapy: merging principle into clinical practice. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010; 20(2):79-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2009.11.001. View

3.
Le Bihan D, Mangin J, Poupon C, Clark C, Pappata S, Molko N . Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13(4):534-46. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1076. View

4.
Liu Y, Sadowski S, Weisbrod A, Kebebew E, Summers R, Yao J . Patient specific tumor growth prediction using multimodal images. Med Image Anal. 2014; 18(3):555-66. PMC: 3992298. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.02.005. View

5.
Hilbert A, Ramos L, van Os H, Olabarriaga S, Tolhuisen M, Wermer M . Data-efficient deep learning of radiological image data for outcome prediction after endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Comput Biol Med. 2019; 115:103516. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103516. View