Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To develop and investigate a set of biophysical models based on a mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model of the spatiotemporal evolution of tumor growth after radiation therapy.
Methods And Materials: Post-radiation therapy response is modeled using a cell death model (M), a reduced proliferation rate model (M), and cell death and reduced proliferation model (M). To evaluate each model, rats (n = 12) with C6 gliomas were imaged with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced MRI at 7 time points over 2 weeks. Rats received either 20 or 40 Gy between the third and fourth imaging time point. Diffusion-weighted MRI was used to estimate tumor cell number within enhancing regions in contrast-enhanced MRI data. Each model was fit to the spatiotemporal evolution of tumor cell number from time point 1 to time point 5 to estimate model parameters. The estimated model parameters were then used to predict tumor growth at the final 2 imaging time points. The model prediction was evaluated by calculating the error in tumor volume estimates, average surface distance, and voxel-based cell number.
Results: For both the rats treated with either 20 or 40 Gy, significantly lower error in tumor volume, average surface distance, and voxel-based cell number was observed for the M and M models compared with the M model. The M model fit, however, had significantly lower sum squared error compared with the M and M models.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that for both doses, the M and M models result in accurate predictions of tumor growth, whereas the M model poorly describes response to radiation therapy.
Dimitriou N, Flores-Torres S, Kyriakidou M, Kinsella J, Mitsis G PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012112.
PMID: 38861575 PMC: 11195982. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012112.
Modeling of brain tumors using , and microfluidic models: A review of the current developments.
Raju R R, AlSawaftah N, Husseini G Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31402.
PMID: 38807869 PMC: 11130649. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31402.
A data assimilation framework to predict the response of glioma cells to radiation.
Liu J, Ii D, Yang J, Yankeelov T Math Biosci Eng. 2023; 20(1):318-336.
PMID: 36650768 PMC: 11165419. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023015.
Lorenzo G, Di Muzio N, Deantoni C, Cozzarini C, Fodor A, Briganti A iScience. 2022; 25(11):105430.
PMID: 36388979 PMC: 9641236. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105430.
Hormuth 2nd D, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Quarles C, Chung C Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022; 187:114367.
PMID: 35654212 PMC: 11165420. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114367.