» Articles » PMID: 29398129

Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2018 Feb 6
PMID 29398129
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop and investigate a set of biophysical models based on a mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model of the spatiotemporal evolution of tumor growth after radiation therapy.

Methods And Materials: Post-radiation therapy response is modeled using a cell death model (M), a reduced proliferation rate model (M), and cell death and reduced proliferation model (M). To evaluate each model, rats (n = 12) with C6 gliomas were imaged with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced MRI at 7 time points over 2 weeks. Rats received either 20 or 40 Gy between the third and fourth imaging time point. Diffusion-weighted MRI was used to estimate tumor cell number within enhancing regions in contrast-enhanced MRI data. Each model was fit to the spatiotemporal evolution of tumor cell number from time point 1 to time point 5 to estimate model parameters. The estimated model parameters were then used to predict tumor growth at the final 2 imaging time points. The model prediction was evaluated by calculating the error in tumor volume estimates, average surface distance, and voxel-based cell number.

Results: For both the rats treated with either 20 or 40 Gy, significantly lower error in tumor volume, average surface distance, and voxel-based cell number was observed for the M and M models compared with the M model. The M model fit, however, had significantly lower sum squared error compared with the M and M models.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that for both doses, the M and M models result in accurate predictions of tumor growth, whereas the M model poorly describes response to radiation therapy.

Citing Articles

Cancer cell sedimentation in 3D cultures reveals active migration regulated by self-generated gradients and adhesion sites.

Dimitriou N, Flores-Torres S, Kyriakidou M, Kinsella J, Mitsis G PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012112.

PMID: 38861575 PMC: 11195982. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012112.


Modeling of brain tumors using , and microfluidic models: A review of the current developments.

Raju R R, AlSawaftah N, Husseini G Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31402.

PMID: 38807869 PMC: 11130649. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31402.


A data assimilation framework to predict the response of glioma cells to radiation.

Liu J, Ii D, Yang J, Yankeelov T Math Biosci Eng. 2023; 20(1):318-336.

PMID: 36650768 PMC: 11165419. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023015.


Patient-specific forecasting of postradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen kinetics enables early prediction of biochemical relapse.

Lorenzo G, Di Muzio N, Deantoni C, Cozzarini C, Fodor A, Briganti A iScience. 2022; 25(11):105430.

PMID: 36388979 PMC: 9641236. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105430.


Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Hormuth 2nd D, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Quarles C, Chung C Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022; 187:114367.

PMID: 35654212 PMC: 11165420. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114367.


References
1.
Barani I, Larson D . Radiation therapy of glioblastoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2014; 163:49-73. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12048-5_4. View

2.
Baldock A, Rockne R, Boone A, Neal M, Hawkins-Daarud A, Corwin D . From patient-specific mathematical neuro-oncology to precision medicine. Front Oncol. 2013; 3:62. PMC: 3613895. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00062. View

3.
Elkin B, Ilankovan A, Morrison 3rd B . A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain. J Neurotrauma. 2011; 28(11):2235-44. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1604. View

4.
Barnes S, Sorace A, Loveless M, Whisenant J, Yankeelov T . Correlation of tumor characteristics derived from DCE-MRI and DW-MRI with histology in murine models of breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28(10):1345-56. PMC: 4573954. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3377. View

5.
Clatz O, Sermesant M, Bondiau P, Delingette H, Warfield S, Malandain G . Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005; 24(10):1334-46. PMC: 2496876. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.857217. View