» Articles » PMID: 35642242

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients After Unplanned Excision

Abstract

Purpose: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) constitute a group of rare, heterogeneous tumors representing approximately 1% of all cancers. Owing to the rarity and pathological diversity of the disease, unplanned excision (UE) has often been performed for STS, resulting in an unfavorable prognosis. This study aimed to clarify clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in STS patients who underwent UE.

Patients And Methods: In a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with STS who underwent surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2015, patients were enrolled to either a UE group or a planned excision (PE) group. An analysis was then conducted to identify factors associated with prognosis after UE.

Results: Of 134 patients undergoing surgery for STS, 110 were enrolled to the PE group and 24 to the UE group. The median size of the primary tumor was significantly smaller, and more lesions were located in the superficial layer in the UE group than in the PE group. In addition, plastic reconstruction after additional radical resection was required significantly more often in the UE group than in the PE group. No significant difference in overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, or disease-free survival (DFS) between the UE and PE groups was observed; however, metastasis-free survival was significantly better in the UE group. In the UE group, poorer DFS was associated with older age (≥61 years) and a larger primary tumor (≥2.9 cm).

Conclusion: A prognosis similar to that in patients undergoing PE could be achieved by appropriate additional surgeries in patients initially undergoing UE. However, UE for STS should be avoided, especially in older patients and those with a larger primary tumor.

Citing Articles

Case report: A challenging case of mixed-variant myofibroblastoma with complex imaging and pathological diagnosis.

Kawasaki T, Ichikawa J, Kanno S, Onohara K, Wako M, Tatsuno R Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1438162.

PMID: 39493459 PMC: 11527774. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1438162.


Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Gouin F, Michot A, Jafari M, Honore C, Mattei J, Rochwerger A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38611043 PMC: 11010862. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071365.


Is Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Associated with Worse Oncological Outcomes?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Larios F, Gonzalez M, Ruiz-Arellanos K, Aquilino E Silva G, Pretell-Mazzini J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38275885 PMC: 10814439. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020443.

References
1.
Gagnet P, Nelson J, Wallace N, McCarthy C, Robbins C, Kessler J . Analysis of the Effect of the Size and Grade of Soft Tissue Sarcoma on Rates of Unplanned Resection, Metastatic Disease, Mortality, and Morbid Re-Resection Over 20 Years. Orthopedics. 2021; 44(3):166-171. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20210104-05. View

2.
Tokumoto H, Akita S, Kubota Y, Mitsukawa N . Effect of unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas on skin defects and reconstructive procedures. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020; 54(6):372-376. DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1799817. View

3.
Zagars G, Ballo M, Pisters P, Pollock R, Patel S, Benjamin R . Surgical margins and reresection in the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma using conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer. 2003; 97(10):2544-53. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11367. View

4.
Bianchi G, Sambri A, Cammelli S, Galuppi A, Cortesi A, Righi A . Impact of residual disease after "unplanned excision" of primary localized adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: evaluation of 452 cases at a single Institution. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017; 101(3):243-248. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-017-0475-y. View

5.
Charoenlap C, Imanishi J, Tanaka T, Slavin J, Ngan S, Chander S . Outcomes of unplanned sarcoma excision: impact of residual disease. Cancer Med. 2016; 5(6):980-8. PMC: 4924354. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.615. View