Changes in Quantitative Sensory Testing and Patient Perspectives Following Spinal Cord Stimulation for Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: An Observational Study with Long-term Follow-up

Overview

Journal Eur J Pain

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Critical Care
Neurology
Psychiatry

Date 2022 May 31

PMID 35638567

Authors

Yannick J G M Plantaz

Robert T M van Dongen

Richard L Witkam

Kris C P Vissers

Hans Timmerman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can impact sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in various ways, which can be accessed via quantitative sensory testing (QST). The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the subjective sensory responses using QST in patients following SCS therapy for PSPS and (2) to get a clinical impression of the results of SCS during an interview of these patients with PSPS and SCS during long term follow-up.

Methods: Forty patients with PSPS who received SCS treatment underwent QST via electrical and mechanical pressure stimuli. QST was performed at four different moments (1) pre-implantation SCS, (2) two weeks postoperatively, (3) three months after permanent SCS implantation and (4) six months after permanent SCS implantation. Patients' perspectives on pain, use of drugs and quality of life were assessed via semi-structured interviews during a follow-up between 5 and 11 years.

Results: We found statistical significant differences in the changes of sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds. A decrease in pain complaints and analgesics use were reported by the patients during follow-up. The quality of life in patients increased from three to eight (NRS 0 [worst QoL imaginable] -10 [best QoL imaginable]) after receiving SCS.

Conclusions: The increased thresholds on areas without pain or being covered by the SCS induced paresthesias may indicate that there are central changes contributing to these deviations in thresholds. The overall QoL in patients improved greatly after receiving SCS.

Significance: This study provides an overview of the effect of SCS on sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in patients with PSPS throughout the SCS treatment process. In addition, this study presents data from 40 patients with PSPS treated with SCS, analysing several long-term patient-reported outcome measures. The results serve to give more insight into the mechanism of SCS and document SCS as a possible treatment for PSPS.

Citing Articles

Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long-term follow-up.

Plantaz Y, van Dongen R, Witkam R, Vissers K, Timmerman H Eur J Pain. 2022; 26(7):1581-1593.

PMID: 35638567 PMC: 9546026. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1984.

References

Chan C, Peng P . Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med. 2011; 12(4):577-606. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01089.x. View

van Helmond N, Timmerman H, Olesen S, Drewes A, Kleinhans J, Wilder-Smith O . A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery. J Vis Exp. 2018; (131). PMC: 5908658. DOI: 10.3791/56918. View

Hunter J, Ashby P . Segmental effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans. J Physiol. 1994; 474(3):407-19. PMC: 1160332. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020032. View

Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C . The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(6):968-74. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. View

Sdrulla A, Guan Y, Raja S . Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms. Pain Pract. 2018; 18(8):1048-1067. PMC: 6391880. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12692. View

Zucco F, Ciampichini R, Lavano A, Costantini A, De Rose M, Poli P . Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: Results From the PRECISE Study. Neuromodulation. 2015; 18(4):266-76. PMC: 5029591. DOI: 10.1111/ner.12292. View

Simpson E, Duenas A, Holmes M, Papaioannou D, Chilcott J . Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of neuropathic or ischaemic origin: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009; 13(17):iii, ix-x, 1-154. DOI: 10.3310/hta13170. View

Timmerman H, Wilder-Smith O, van Weel C, Wolff A, Vissers K . Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component. BMC Neurol. 2014; 14:94. PMC: 4046010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-94. View

Witkam R, Kurt E, van Dongen R, Arnts I, Steegers M, Vissers K . Experiences From the Patient Perspective on Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed Method Analysis. Neuromodulation. 2020; 24(1):112-125. PMC: 7891647. DOI: 10.1111/ner.13277. View

10.

Taylor R, Desai M, Rigoard P, Taylor R . Predictors of pain relief following spinal cord stimulation in chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Pain Pract. 2013; 14(6):489-505. PMC: 4238825. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12095. View

11.

Doerr M, Krainick J, Thoden U . Pain perception in man after long term spinal cord stimulation. J Neurol. 1978; 217(4):261-70. DOI: 10.1007/BF00312987. View

12.

Plantaz Y, van Dongen R, Witkam R, Vissers K, Timmerman H . Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long-term follow-up. Eur J Pain. 2022; 26(7):1581-1593. PMC: 9546026. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1984. View

13.

Sheldon B, Staudt M, Williams L, Harland T, Pilitsis J . Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course. Neurosurg Rev. 2020; 44(2):709-720. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01299-y. View

14.

Campbell C, Jamison R, Edwards R . Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012; 17(1):307. PMC: 3601592. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-012-0307-6. View

15.

Petersen E, Schatman M, Sayed D, Deer T . Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: New Terminology for a New Era. J Pain Res. 2021; 14:1627-1630. PMC: 8197591. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S320923. View

16.

Rajaee S, Bae H, Kanim L, Delamarter R . Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb. View

17.

Shealy C, Mortimer J, HAGFORS N . Dorsal column electroanalgesia. J Neurosurg. 1970; 32(5):560-4. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1970.32.5.0560. View

18.

Kumar K, Taylor R, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J . Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain. 2007; 132(1-2):179-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028. View

19.

Thomson S . Failed back surgery syndrome - definition, epidemiology and demographics. Br J Pain. 2015; 7(1):56-9. PMC: 4590156. DOI: 10.1177/2049463713479096. View

20.

Mironer Y, Somerville J . Pain tolerance threshold: a pilot study of an objective measurement of spinal cord stimulator trial results. Pain Med. 2004; 1(2):110-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.00019.x. View