» Articles » PMID: 35632025

Improving the Quality of Measurements Made by Alphasense NO Non-Reference Sensors Using the Mathematical Methods

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35632025
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional NO monitoring devices are relatively cumbersome, expensive, and have a relatively high-power consumption that limits their use to fixed sites. On the other hand, they offer high-quality measurements. In contrast, the low-cost NO sensors offer greater flexibility, are smaller, and allow greater coverage of the area with the measuring devices. However, their disadvantage is much lower accuracy. The main goal of this study was to investigate the measurement data quality of NO2-B43F Alphasense sensors. The measurement performance analysis of Alphasense NO2-B43F sensors was conducted in two research areas in Poland. Sensors were placed near fixed, professional air quality monitoring stations, carrying out measurements based on reference methods, in the following periods: July-November, and December-May. Results of the study show that without using sophisticated correction methods, the range of measured air pollution concentrations may be greater than their actual values in ambient air-measured in the field by fixed stations. In the case of summer months (with air temperature over 30 °C), the long-term mean absolute percentage error was over 150% and the sensors, using the methods recommended by the manufacturer, in the case of high temperatures could even show negative values. After applying the mathematical correction functions proposed in this article, it was possible to significantly reduce long-term errors (to 40-70% per month, regardless of the location of the measurements) and eliminate negative measurement values. The proposed method is based on the recalculation of the raw measurement, air temperature, and air RH and does not require the use of extensive analytical tools.

Citing Articles

Impacts of daily household activities on indoor particulate and NO concentrations; a case study from oxford UK.

Singh A, Bartington S, Abreu P, Anderson R, Cowell N, Leach F Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e34210.

PMID: 39165984 PMC: 11333897. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34210.


Leveraging Temporal Information to Improve Machine Learning-Based Calibration Techniques for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors.

Ali S, Alam F, Potgieter J, Arif K Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(9).

PMID: 38733036 PMC: 11086096. DOI: 10.3390/s24092930.


Sensors Network as an Added Value for the Characterization of Spatial and Temporal Air Quality Patterns at the Urban Scale.

Graca D, Reis J, Gama C, Monteiro A, Rodrigues V, Rebelo M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(4).

PMID: 36850456 PMC: 9967040. DOI: 10.3390/s23041859.


Unexpected Performance Improvements of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Sensors by Including Carbon Monoxide Sensor Signal.

Hasan M, Yu H, Ivey C, Pillarisetti A, Yuan Z, Do K ACS Omega. 2023; 8(6):5917-5924.

PMID: 36816698 PMC: 9933490. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07734.


Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.

Ali S, Alam F, Arif K, Potgieter J Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(2).

PMID: 36679650 PMC: 9862378. DOI: 10.3390/s23020854.


References
1.
Laref R, Losson E, Sava A, Siadat M . Empiric Unsupervised Drifts Correction Method of Electrochemical Sensors for in Field Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(11). PMC: 8196723. DOI: 10.3390/s21113581. View

2.
Liu X, Jayaratne R, Thai P, Kuhn T, Zing I, Christensen B . Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring. Environ Res. 2020; 185:109438. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109438. View

3.
Zuidema C, Afshar-Mohajer N, Tatum M, Thomas G, Peters T, Koehler K . Efficacy of Paired Electrochemical Sensors for Measuring Ozone Concentrations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018; 16(2):179-190. PMC: 10494896. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1540872. View

4.
Castell N, Dauge F, Schneider P, Vogt M, Lerner U, Fishbain B . Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?. Environ Int. 2017; 99:293-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007. View

5.
Feinberg S, Williams R, Hagler G, Rickard J, Brown R, Garver D . Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmos Meas Tech. 2019; 11(8):4605-4615. PMC: 6781239. DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018. View