» Articles » PMID: 35624306

Perceptual Sensory Attenuation in Chronic Pain Subjects and Healthy Controls

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 27
PMID 35624306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated whether sensory attenuation (or failure of) might be an explanation for heightened pain perceptions in individuals with chronic pain. N = 131 (50% chronic pain) individuals underwent a single experimental session, which included the force-matching task and several self-reported symptom and psychological measures. Individuals matched a force delivered to their finger, either by pressing directly on their own finger with their other hand (direct) or by using potentiometer to control the force through a torque motor (slider). All participants overestimated the target force in the direct condition reflecting the sensory attenuation phenomenon. No differences in the magnitude of sensory attenuation between chronic pain and control groups were observed (direct: Z = - 0.90, p = 0.37 and slider: Z = - 1.41, p = 0.16). An increased variance of sensory attenuation was observed in chronic pain individuals (direct: F(1, 129) = 7.22, p = 0.008 and slider: F(1, 129), p = 0.05). Performance in the slider condition was correlated with depressive symptoms (r = - 0.24, p = 0.05), high symptom count (r = - 0.25, p = 0.04) and positive affect (r = 0.28, p = 0.02). These were only identified in the chronic pain individuals. Overall, our findings reveal no clear differences in the magnitude of sensory attenuation between groups. Future research is needed to determine the relevance of sensory attenuation in neuro-cognitive models related to pain perception.

Citing Articles

Can Exercise Affect the Pain Characteristics in Patients with Fibromyalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Vrouva S, Sopidou V, Koutsioumpa E, Chanopoulos K, Nikolopoulou A, Papatsimpas V Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36553951 PMC: 9778432. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122426.


Methodological considerations for the force-matching task.

McNaughton D, Hope R, Gray E, Xavier F, Beath A, Jones M Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(6):2979-2988.

PMID: 36002628 PMC: 10556179. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w.

References
1.
Ongaro G, Kaptchuk T . Symptom perception, placebo effects, and the Bayesian brain. Pain. 2018; 160(1):1-4. PMC: 6319577. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001367. View

2.
Constantinou E, Bogaerts K, Van Diest I, Van den Bergh O . Inducing symptoms in high symptom reporters via emotional pictures: the interactive effects of valence and arousal. J Psychosom Res. 2013; 74(3):191-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.12.015. View

3.
WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

4.
Kroenke K, Wu J, Yu Z, Bair M, Kean J, Stump T . Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale: Initial Validation in Three Clinical Trials. Psychosom Med. 2016; 78(6):716-27. PMC: 4927366. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000322. View

5.
Wolpert D, Flanagan J . Motor prediction. Curr Biol. 2001; 11(18):R729-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00432-8. View