» Articles » PMID: 35621897

Integration of Deep Learning and Active Shape Models for More Accurate Prostate Segmentation in 3D MR Images

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 May 27
PMID 35621897
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a growing role in the clinical workup of prostate cancer. However, manual three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of the prostate is a laborious and time-consuming task. In this scenario, the use of automated algorithms for prostate segmentation allows us to bypass the huge workload of physicians. In this work, we propose a fully automated hybrid approach for prostate gland segmentation in MR images using an initial segmentation of prostate volumes using a custom-made 3D deep network (VNet-T2), followed by refinement using an Active Shape Model (ASM). While the deep network focuses on three-dimensional spatial coherence of the shape, the ASM relies on local image information and this joint effort allows for improved segmentation of the organ contours. Our method is developed and tested on a dataset composed of T2-weighted (T2w) MRI prostatic volumes of 60 male patients. In the test set, the proposed method shows excellent segmentation performance, achieving a mean dice score and Hausdorff distance of 0.851 and 7.55 mm, respectively. In the future, this algorithm could serve as an enabling technology for the development of computer-aided systems for prostate cancer characterization in MR imaging.

Citing Articles

Advancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Deep Learning Approach for Enhanced Detection in MRI Images.

Horasan A, Gunes A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272656 PMC: 11393904. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171871.


Deep Learning Prostate MRI Segmentation Accuracy and Robustness: A Systematic Review.

Fassia M, Balasubramanian A, Woo S, Vargas H, Hricak H, Konukoglu E Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 6(4):e230138.

PMID: 38568094 PMC: 11294957. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230138.


Prostate volume analysis in image registration for prostate cancer care: a verification study.

Bugeja J, Mehawed G, Roberts M, Rukin N, Dowling J, Murray R Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 46(4):1791-1802.

PMID: 37819450 PMC: 10703743. DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01342-4.


Advancements in MRI-Based Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects.

Chaddad A, Tan G, Liang X, Hassan L, Rathore S, Desrosiers C Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568655 PMC: 10416937. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153839.

References
1.
Shahedi M, Cool D, Romagnoli C, Bauman G, Bastian-Jordan M, Gibson E . Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods. Med Phys. 2014; 41(11):113503. DOI: 10.1118/1.4899182. View

2.
Gupta E, Torigian D . MR Imaging of the Prostate Gland. PET Clin. 2016; 4(2):139-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2009.05.008. View

3.
Meyer A, Chlebus G, Rak M, Schindele D, Schostak M, van Ginneken B . Anisotropic 3D Multi-Stream CNN for Accurate Prostate Segmentation from Multi-Planar MRI. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 200:105821. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105821. View

4.
Sled J, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(1):87-97. DOI: 10.1109/42.668698. View

5.
Mai J, Abubrig M, Lehmann T, Hilbert T, Weiland E, Grimm M . T2 Mapping in Prostate Cancer. Invest Radiol. 2018; 54(3):146-152. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000520. View