» Articles » PMID: 35621269

Use of Sickness Benefits by Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer-A Swedish Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Nursing
Oncology
Date 2022 May 27
PMID 35621269
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence and predictors of sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) in women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

Methods: Data were obtained from Swedish registers concerning 1,240 adult women diagnosed 1997-2011 with mBC, from 1 year before (y-1) to 2 (y1) and 2 (y2) years after diagnosis. SA and DP prevalence was calculated. Odds ratios (AOR) were determined for factors associated with using long-term (SA > 180 days or DP > 0 days) sickness benefits.

Results: Prevalence of SA and DP was 56.0% and 24.8% during y-1, 69.9% and 28.9% during y1, and 64.0% and 34.7% during y2, respectively. Odds of using long-term sickness benefits were higher y1 and y2 in patients using long-term sickness benefits the year before diagnosis (AOR = 3.82, 95% CI 2.91-5.02; AOR = 4.31, 95% CI 2.96-6.29, respectively) and y2 in patients with mBC diagnosis 1997-2000 (AOR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.10-3.08) and using long-term sickness benefits the year after diagnosis (AOR = 22.10, 95% CI 14.33-34.22).

Conclusions: The prevalence of sickness benefit utilisation was high and increased after mBC diagnosis, particularly for patients using long-term sickness benefits prior to diagnosis. Additional study is needed to determine factors that might reduce the need for sickness benefits and enhance work ability in these patients.

Citing Articles

Planning for return to work during the first year after breast cancer metastasis: A Swedish cohort study.

Johnsson A, Kiani N, Gernaat S, Wilking U, Shabo I, Hedayati E Cancer Med. 2023; 12(9):10840-10850.

PMID: 36880198 PMC: 10225211. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5752.


Use of sickness benefits by patients with metastatic breast cancer-A Swedish cohort study.

Altena R, Gernaat S, Wilking U, Kiani N, Johnsson A, Hedayati E Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022; 31(5):e13626.

PMID: 35621269 PMC: 9541357. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13626.

References
1.
Tamminga S, de Boer A, Bos M, Fons G, Kitzen J, Plaisier P . A hospital-based work support intervention to enhance the return to work of cancer patients: a process evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 22(4):565-78. PMC: 3484279. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9372-2. View

2.
Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S . Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors' work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014; 8(4):657-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0377-z. View

3.
Caswell-Jin J, Plevritis S, Tian L, Cadham C, Xu C, Stout N . Change in Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer with Treatment Advances: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019; 2(4):pky062. PMC: 6305243. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pky062. View

4.
Plym A, Johansson A, Bower H, Voss M, Holmberg L, Fredriksson I . Causes of sick leave, disability pension, and death following a breast cancer diagnosis in women of working age. Breast. 2019; 45:48-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.02.012. View

5.
Salonen L, Blomgren J, Laaksonen M . From long-term sickness absence to disability retirement: diagnostic and occupational class differences within the working-age Finnish population. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1078. PMC: 7346453. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09158-7. View