» Articles » PMID: 35614937

Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid in Renal Transplant Patients: A Comparison of the Early and Stable Posttransplant Stages

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2022 May 26
PMID 35614937
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an antimetabolic immunosuppressive drug widely used in solid organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of MPA demonstrates high inter- and intra-variability. The aim of this study was to compare the population PK properties of MPA in adult renal transplant patients in the early and stable post-transplant stages and to simulate an optimal dosing regimen for patients at different stages. A total of 51 patients in the early post-transplant period (1 week after surgery) and 48 patients in the stable state (5.5-10 years after surgery) were included in the study. In the two-compartment population PK model, CL/F (23.36 L/h vs. 10.25 L/h) and V/F (78.07 vs. 16.24 L) were significantly different between the two stages. The dose-adjusted area under the concentration time curve (AUC/dose) for patients in the early stage were significantly lower than those for patients in the stable state (40.83 ± 22.26 mg h/L vs. 77.86 ± 21.34 mg h/L; < 0.001). According to Monte Carlo simulations, patients with 1.0-1.5 g of mycophenolate mofetil twice daily in the early phase and 0.50-0.75 g twice daily in the stable phase had a high probability of achieving an AUC of 30-60 mg h/L. In addition, limited sampling strategies showed that two 4-point models (C0-C1-C2-C4 and C1-C2-C3-C6) performed well in predicting MPA exposure by both Bayesian estimate and regression equation and could be applied in clinical practice to assist therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA.

Citing Articles

Population pharmacokinetic analysis identifies an absorption process model for mycophenolic acid in patients with renal transplant.

Suzuki Y, Matsunaga N, Aoyama T, Ogami C, Hasegawa C, Iida S Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(12):e70097.

PMID: 39629510 PMC: 11615510. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70097.


Immune Monitoring of Mycophenolate Mofetil Activity in Healthy Volunteers Using T Cell Function Assays.

In t Veld A, Jansen M, de Kam M, Yavuz Y, Moes D, Oudhoff K Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 37376083 PMC: 10304630. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061635.


Clinical Evidence on the Purported Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Corticosteroids and Mycophenolic Acid.

Rong Y, Kiang T Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023; 62(2):157-207.

PMID: 36848031 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01212-y.


Individualized Patient Care Through Model-Informed Precision Dosing: Reflections on Training Future Practitioners.

Jelliffe R, Liu J, Drusano G, Martinez M AAPS J. 2022; 24(6):117.

PMID: 36380020 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-022-00769-z.

References
1.
Cremers S, Schoemaker R, Scholten E, den Hartigh J, Konig-Quartel J, van Kan E . Characterizing the role of enterohepatic recycling in the interactions between mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant patients by pharmacokinetic modelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005; 60(3):249-56. PMC: 1884762. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02398.x. View

2.
Cattaneo D, Perico N, Gaspari F, Gotti E, Remuzzi G . Glucocorticoids interfere with mycophenolate mofetil bioavailability in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2002; 62(3):1060-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00531.x. View

3.
Le Guellec C, Bourgoin H, Buchler M, Le Meur Y, Lebranchu Y, Marquet P . Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of mycophenolic acid concentrations in stable renal transplant patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004; 43(4):253-66. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200443040-00004. View

4.
Atcheson B, Taylor P, Kirkpatrick C, Duffull S, Mudge D, Pillans P . Free mycophenolic acid should be monitored in renal transplant recipients with hypoalbuminemia. Ther Drug Monit. 2004; 26(3):284-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200406000-00011. View

5.
van Gelder T, Le Meur Y, Shaw L, Oellerich M, DeNofrio D, Holt C . Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 2006; 28(2):145-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000199358.80013.bd. View