» Articles » PMID: 16120063

Characterizing the Role of Enterohepatic Recycling in the Interactions Between Mycophenolate Mofetil and Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplant Patients by Pharmacokinetic Modelling

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2005 Aug 27
PMID 16120063
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Controversy remains about the interaction between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin (CsA) and tacrolimus (TACR). The need to double the dose of MMF in case of CsA co-administration to achieve the same mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels as in TACR co-administration, has been attributed to either inhibition by CsA of the enterohepatic cycle, or an inhibition of glucuronidation to mycophenolate glucuronide (MPAG) by TACR. We explored these interactions clinically in 64 kidney transplant patients.

Methods: Plasma MPA/MPAG curves were determined during the first year post transplantation. Using nonlinear mixed effect modelling, MPA/MPAG data were fitted to a four-compartment model, in which a rate constant describing transfer from the fourth to the first compartment (k41), and therefore enterohepatic recycling, could be introduced.

Results: MPA and MPAG plasma concentrations were adequately described by a four-compartment model, which was significantly improved by introduction of k41 in case of TACR co-administration (minimum value of the objective function decreased by 181 points, P < 0.0001). Using this model, no statistically significant difference was observed in clearance of MPA between TACR and CsA co-administration (11.9 and 14.1 l h(-1), respectively). Total clearance of MPAG was lower in case of CsA co-administration (1.45 and 0.92 l h(-1), respectively), while there was no difference in renal clearance of MPAG (1.09 and 0.92 l h(-1), respectively).

Conclusions: Our study supplies supportive clinical evidence that inhibition of the enterohepatic cycle in case of CsA co-administration explains some of the differences observed in PK of MMF when co-administered with either TACR or CsA. This finding may have clinical consequences for the immunosuppressive management of kidney transplant patients.

Citing Articles

Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid in Renal Transplant Patients: A Comparison of the Early and Stable Posttransplant Stages.

Wang P, Xie H, Zhang Q, Tian X, Feng Y, Qin Z Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:859351.

PMID: 35614937 PMC: 9126255. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.859351.


Gastrointestinal complications after kidney transplantation.

Gioco R, Corona D, Ekser B, Puzzo L, Inserra G, Pinto F World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(38):5797-5811.

PMID: 33132635 PMC: 7579754. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i38.5797.


Effect of Protein Binding on Exposure of Unbound and Total Mycophenolic Acid: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Chinese Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Sheng C, Zhao Q, Niu W, Qiu X, Zhang M, Jiao Z Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:340.

PMID: 32265712 PMC: 7100081. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00340.


Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid Co-Administered with Tacrolimus in Corticosteroid-Free Adult Kidney Transplant Patients.

Rong Y, Mayo P, Ensom M, Kiang T Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019; 58(11):1483-1495.

PMID: 31055791 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00771-3.


Systematic external evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of mycophenolate mofetil in adult kidney transplant recipients co-administered with tacrolimus.

Zhang H, Sheng C, Liu L, Luo B, Fu Q, Zhao Q Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 85(4):746-761.

PMID: 30597603 PMC: 6422729. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13850.


References
1.
Keown P, Landsberg D, Halloran P, Shoker A, Rush D, Jeffery J . A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients. Report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group. Transplantation. 1996; 62(12):1744-52. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199612270-00009. View

2.
Sollinger H . Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Transplantation. 1995; 60(3):225-32. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199508000-00003. View

3.
Bullingham R, Nicholls A, Kamm B . Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998; 34(6):429-55. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199834060-00002. View

4.
Shapiro R, Jordan M, Scantlebury V, Vivas C, Marsh J, McCauley J . A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus/prednisone versus tacrolimus/prednisone/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1999; 67(3):411-5. PMC: 2952470. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199902150-00012. View

5.
Zucker K, Tsaroucha A, Olson L, Esquenazi V, Tzakis A, Miller J . Evidence that tacrolimus augments the bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil through the inhibition of mycophenolic acid glucuronidation. Ther Drug Monit. 1999; 21(1):35-43. DOI: 10.1097/00007691-199902000-00006. View