» Articles » PMID: 35613043

Sequential Epiretinal Stimulation Improves Discrimination in Simple Shape Discrimination Tasks Only

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2022 May 25
PMID 35613043
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. Electrical stimulation of the retina can elicit flashes of light called phosphenes, which can be used to restore rudimentary vision for people with blindness. Functional sight requires stimulation of multiple electrodes to create patterned vision, but phosphenes tend to merge together in an uninterpretable way. Sequentially stimulating electrodes in human visual cortex has recently demonstrated that shapes could be 'drawn' with better perceptual resolution relative to simultaneous stimulation. The goal of this study was to evaluate if sequential stimulation would also form clearer shapes when the retina is the neural target.. Two human participants with retinitis pigmentosa who had ArgusII epiretinal prostheses participated in this study. We evaluated different temporal parameters for sequential stimulation and performed phosphene shape mapping and forced choice discrimination tasks. For the discrimination tasks, performance was compared between stimulating electrodes simultaneously versus sequentially.. Phosphenes elicited by different electrodes were reported as vastly different shapes. For sequential stimulation, the optimal pulse train duration was 200 ms when stimulating at 20 Hz and the optimal gap interval was tied between 0 and 50 ms. Sequential electrode stimulation outperformed simultaneous stimulation in simple discrimination tasks, in which shapes were created by stimulating 3-4 electrodes, but not in more complex discrimination tasks involving ≥5 electrodes. The efficacy of sequential stimulation depended strongly on selecting electrodes that elicited phosphenes with similar shapes and sizes.. An epiretinal prosthesis can produce coherent simple shapes with a sequential stimulation paradigm, which can be used as rudimentary visual feedback. However, success in creating more complex shapes, such as letters of the alphabet, is still limited. Sequential stimulation may be most beneficial for epiretinal prostheses in simple tasks, such as basic navigation, rather than complex tasks such as novel object identification.

Citing Articles

Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users.

Hou Y, Nanduri D, Granley J, Weiland J, Beyeler M J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(2).

PMID: 38457841 PMC: 11003296. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad31c4.


Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users.

Hou Y, Nanduri D, Granley J, Weiland J, Beyeler M medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37546858 PMC: 10402233. DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.21.23292908.


Clinical Progress and Optimization of Information Processing in Artificial Visual Prostheses.

Wang J, Zhao R, Li P, Fang Z, Li Q, Han Y Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17).

PMID: 36081002 PMC: 9460383. DOI: 10.3390/s22176544.


Percepts evoked by multi-electrode stimulation of human visual cortex.

Bosking W, Oswalt D, Foster B, Sun P, Beauchamp M, Yoshor D Brain Stimul. 2022; 15(5):1163-1177.

PMID: 35985472 PMC: 9831085. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.08.007.

References
1.
Oswalt D, Bosking W, Sun P, Sheth S, Niketeghad S, Armenta Salas M . Multi-electrode stimulation evokes consistent spatial patterns of phosphenes and improves phosphene mapping in blind subjects. Brain Stimul. 2021; 14(5):1356-1372. PMC: 8488973. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.08.024. View

2.
Rizzo 3rd J, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D . Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(12):5362-9. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0817. View

3.
Wilke R, Moghadam G, Lovell N, Suaning G, Dokos S . Electric crosstalk impairs spatial resolution of multi-electrode arrays in retinal implants. J Neural Eng. 2011; 8(4):046016. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046016. View

4.
Barry M, Dagnelie G . Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(9):5095-101. PMC: 3416020. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9536. View

5.
Nanduri D, Fine I, Horsager A, Boynton G, Humayun M, Greenberg R . Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 53(1):205-14. PMC: 3292357. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8401. View