» Articles » PMID: 33991713

Eye Movements and the Perceived Location of Phosphenes Generated by Intracranial Primary Visual Cortex Stimulation in the Blind

Overview
Journal Brain Stimul
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 May 15
PMID 33991713
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Restoring sight for the blind using electrical stimulation of the visual pathways is feasible but demands an understanding of the spatial mapping of the visual world at the site of targeted stimulation, whether in the retina, thalamus, or cortex. While a visual cortex stimulator can bypass the eye and create visual percepts, there is an inherent dissociation between this stimulation and eye movements. It is unknown whether and how robustly the brain maintains the oculomotor circuitry in patients with bare- or no-light perception.

Objective: To critically and quantitatively evaluate the effect of eye movements have on phosphene locations elicited by cortical stimulation that bypasses the eyes in order to restore sight in blind subjects.

Methods: The NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulator (RNS) and the Orion visual cortical prosthesis devices were used to electrically stimulate the visual cortex of blind subjects with bare or no light perception. Eye positions were recorded synchronized with stimulation and the location of the percepts were measured using a handheld marker.

Results: The locations of cortical stimulation-evoked percepts are shifted based on the eye position at the time of stimulation. Measured responses can be remapped based on measured eye positions to determine the retinotopic locations associated with the implanted electrodes, with remapped responses having variance limited by pointing error.

Conclusions: Eye movements dominate the perceived location of cortical stimulation-evoked phosphenes, even after years of blindness. By accounting for eye positions, we can mimic retinal mapping as in natural sight.

Citing Articles

Aligning Visual Prosthetic Development With Implantee Needs.

Nadolskis L, Turkstra L, Larnyo E, Beyeler M Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(11):28.

PMID: 39570616 PMC: 11585069. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.28.


Advances and challenges in the development of visual prostheses.

Fernandez E, Robles J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(10):e3002896.

PMID: 39446886 PMC: 11616817. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002896.


Implanted cortical neuroprosthetics for speech and movement restoration.

Muirhead W, Layard Horsfall H, Aicardi C, Carolan J, Akram H, Vanhoestenberghe A J Neurol. 2024; 271(11):7156-7168.

PMID: 39446156 PMC: 11561076. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12604-w.


Aligning visual prosthetic development with implantee needs.

Nadolskis L, Turkstra L, Larnyo E, Beyeler M medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559196 PMC: 10980134. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.12.24304186.


A novel simulation paradigm utilising MRI-derived phosphene maps for cortical prosthetic vision.

Wang H, Wong Y J Neural Eng. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 37531948 PMC: 10594539. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aceca2.