» Articles » PMID: 35612324

Machine Learning for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction: Current Practice, Limitations, and Clinical Perspective

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 May 25
PMID 35612324
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health crisis that poses a great threat to modern medicine. Effective prevention strategies are urgently required to slow the emergence and further dissemination of AMR. Given the availability of data sets encompassing hundreds or thousands of pathogen genomes, machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to predict resistance to different antibiotics in pathogens based on gene content and genome composition. A key objective of this work is to advocate for the incorporation of ML into front-line settings but also highlight the further refinements that are necessary to safely and confidently incorporate these methods. The question of what to predict is not trivial given the existence of different quantitative and qualitative laboratory measures of AMR. ML models typically treat genes as independent predictors, with no consideration of structural and functional linkages; they also may not be accurate when new mutational variants of known AMR genes emerge. Finally, to have the technology trusted by end users in public health settings, ML models need to be transparent and explainable to ensure that the basis for prediction is clear. We strongly advocate that the next set of AMR-ML studies should focus on the refinement of these limitations to be able to bridge the gap to diagnostic implementation.

Citing Articles

How AI can help us beat AMR.

Arnold A, McLellan S, Stokes J NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2025; 3(1):18.

PMID: 40082590 PMC: 11906734. DOI: 10.1038/s44259-025-00085-4.


Reliable machine learning models in genomic medicine using conformal prediction.

Papangelou C, Kyriakidis K, Natsiavas P, Chouvarda I, Malousi A Front Bioinform. 2025; 5:1507448.

PMID: 40066074 PMC: 11891349. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1507448.


the impact of stakeholder decision-making on antimicrobial resistance evolution.

Ashfield T, Cooray M, Jimenez-Acha I, Riaz Z, Gifford D, Lagator M Microbiology (Reading). 2025; 171(2).

PMID: 40008972 PMC: 11865498. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001534.


Large-scale genomic analysis reveals significant role of insertion sequences in antimicrobial resistance of .

Xie F, Wang L, Li S, Hu L, Wen Y, Li X mBio. 2025; 16(3):e0285224.

PMID: 39976435 PMC: 11898611. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02852-24.


Frontiers in superbug management: innovating approaches to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Chambial P, Thakur N, Bhukya P, Subbaiyan A, Kumar U Arch Microbiol. 2025; 207(3):60.

PMID: 39953143 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-025-04262-x.


References
1.
Anahtar M, Yang J, Kanjilal S . Applications of Machine Learning to the Problem of Antimicrobial Resistance: an Emerging Model for Translational Research. J Clin Microbiol. 2021; 59(7):e0126020. PMC: 8218744. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01260-20. View

2.
Lim A, Naidenov B, Bates H, Willyerd K, Snider T, Couger M . Nanopore ultra-long read sequencing technology for antimicrobial resistance detection in Mannheimia haemolytica. J Microbiol Methods. 2019; 159:138-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.03.001. View

3.
Benkwitz-Bedford S, Palm M, Demirtas T, Mustonen V, Farewell A, Warringer J . Machine Learning Prediction of Resistance to Subinhibitory Antimicrobial Concentrations from Escherichia coli Genomes. mSystems. 2021; 6(4):e0034621. PMC: 8407197. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00346-21. View

4.
Alam M, Petit 3rd R, Crispell E, Thornton T, Conneely K, Jiang Y . Dissecting vancomycin-intermediate resistance in staphylococcus aureus using genome-wide association. Genome Biol Evol. 2014; 6(5):1174-85. PMC: 4040999. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu092. View

5.
Wong A . Epistasis and the Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:246. PMC: 5313483. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00246. View