» Articles » PMID: 35609311

Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic to Improve the Health, Social Care, and Well-being of Minoritized Ethnic Groups With Chronic Conditions or Impairments: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 May 24
PMID 35609311
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has inequitably impacted the experiences of people living with ill health/impairments or from minoritized ethnic groups across all areas of life. Given possible parallels in inequities for disabled people and people from minoritized ethnic backgrounds, their existence before the pandemic and increase since, and the discriminations that each group faces, our interest is in understanding the interplay between being disabled AND being from a minoritized ethnic group.

Objective: The overarching aim of the Coronavirus Chronic Conditions and Disabilities Awareness (CICADA) project, building on this understanding, is to improve pandemic and longer-term support networks, and access to and experiences of care, services, and resources for these underserved groups, both during the pandemic and longer term, thereby reducing inequities and enhancing social, health, and well-being outcomes.

Methods: This mixed methods study involves three "sweeps" of a new UK survey; secondary analyses of existing cohort and panel surveys; a rapid scoping review; a more granular review; and qualitative insights from over 200 semistructured interviews, including social network/map/photo elicitation methods and two subsequent sets of remote participatory research workshops. Separate stakeholder cocreation meetings, running throughout the study, will develop analyses and outputs. Our longitudinal study design enables the exploration of significant relationships between variables in the survey data collected and to the assessment of changes in variables over time, including consideration of varying pandemic contexts. The qualitative data will provide more granular detail. We will take a strengths and assets-based approach, underpinned by the social model of disability and by intersectional considerations to challenge discrimination. Our exploration of the social determinants of health and well-being is framed by the social ecological model.

Results: The CICADA project was funded by the Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme of the United Kingdom (UK) National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) in March 2021 and began in May 2021. Further work within the project (84 interviews) was commissioned in March 2022, a substudy focusing on mental health, specifically in Northeast England, Greater Manchester, and the Northwest Coast of the United Kingdom. Data collection began in August 2021, with the last participants due to be recruited in September 2022. As of January 2022, 5792 survey respondents and 227 interviewees had provided data. From April 2022, the time of article submission, we will recruit participants for the substudy and wave 2 of the surveys and qualitative work. We expect results to be published by winter 2022.

Conclusions: In studying the experiences of disabled people with impairments and those living with chronic conditions who come from certain minoritized ethnic groups, we are aiming for transformative research to improve their health and well-being.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/38361.

Citing Articles

Compliance with COVID-19 government guidance and rules by disabled people and people from minoritised ethnic groups: Qualitative findings from the CICADA study.

Rivas C, Anand K, Moore A PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0301242.

PMID: 39298441 PMC: 11412500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301242.


Social support and mental well-being among people with and without chronic illness during the Covid-19 pandemic: evidence from the longitudinal UCL covid survey.

Aksoy O, Wu A, Aksoy S, Rivas C BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):136.

PMID: 38468353 PMC: 10929080. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01596-x.

References
1.
Wolf E, Harrington K, Clark S, Miller M . Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2015; 76(6):913-934. PMC: 4334479. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237. View

2.
Aksoy O, Bann D, Fluharty M, Nandi A . Religiosity and Mental Wellbeing Among Members of Majority and Minority Religions: Findings From Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2021; 191(1):20-30. PMC: 8751808. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab133. View

3.
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A . Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(10):1435-43. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938. View

4.
Rains L, Johnson S, Barnett P, Steare T, Needle J, Carr S . Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care and on people with mental health conditions: framework synthesis of international experiences and responses. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020; 56(1):13-24. PMC: 7429938. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-01924-7. View

5.
Mathur R, Rentsch C, Morton C, Hulme W, Schultze A, Mackenna B . Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death in 17 million adults in England: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform. Lancet. 2021; 397(10286):1711-1724. PMC: 8087292. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00634-6. View