Search for Morphological Indicators That Predict Implantation by Principal Component Analysis Using Images of Blastocyst

Overview

Journal PeerJ

Specialties Biology
Environmental Health
General Medicine

Date 2022 May 23

PMID 35602891

Authors

Daisuke Mashiko

Mikiko Tokoro

Masae Kojima

Noritaka Fukunaga

Yoshimasa Asada

Kazuo Yamagata

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Although the current evaluation of human blastocysts is based on the Gardner criteria, there may be other notable parameters. The purpose of our study was to clarify whether the morphology of blastocysts has notable indicators other than the Gardner criteria.

Methods: To find such indicators, we compared blastocysts that showed elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels after transplantation (hCG-positive group; = 129) and those that did not (hCG-negative group; = 105) using principal component analysis of pixel brightness of the images.

Results: The comparison revealed that the hCG-positive group had grainy morphology and the hCG-negative group had non-grainy morphology. Classification of the blastocysts by this indicator did not make a difference in Gardner score. Interestingly, all embryos with ≥20% fragmentation were non-grainy. The visual classification based on this analysis was significantly more accurate than the prediction of implantation using the Gardner score ≥3BB. As graininess can be used in combination with the Gardner score, this indicator will enhance current reproductive technologies.

References

Kragh M, Rimestad J, Berntsen J, Karstoft H . Automatic grading of human blastocysts from time-lapse imaging. Comput Biol Med. 2019; 115:103494. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103494. View

Patrizio P, Shoham G, Shoham Z, Leong M, Barad D, Gleicher N . Worldwide live births following the transfer of chromosomally "Abnormal" embryos after PGT/A: results of a worldwide web-based survey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(8):1599-1607. PMC: 6707985. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01510-0. View

Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H . Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(12):2340-2348. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez229. View

Kitasaka H, Konuma Y, Tokoro M, Fukunaga N, Asada Y . Oocyte cytoplasmic diameter of ≥130 μm can be used to determine human giant oocytes. F S Sci. 2022; 3(1):10-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfss.2021.11.004. View

Staessen C, Camus M, Bollen N, Devroey P, van Steirteghem A . The relationship between embryo quality and the occurrence of multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57(3):626-30. View

Matsuura K, Hayashi N, Takiue C, Hirata R, Habara T, Naruse K . Blastocyst quality scoring based on morphologic grading correlates with cell number. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(3):1135-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.003. View

Subira J, Craig J, Turner K, Bevan A, Ohuma E, McVeigh E . Grade of the inner cell mass, but not trophectoderm, predicts live birth in fresh blastocyst single transfers. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016; 19(4):254-261. DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2016.1223357. View

Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe K, Ramsing N, Remohi J . The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(10):2658-71. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der256. View

Teranishi A, Kuwata A, Fumino T, Hamai H, Shigeta M . A theoretical model for single blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009; 26(6):327-34. PMC: 2729859. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9321-y. View

10.

Hill M, Richter K, Heitmann R, Graham J, Tucker M, DeCherney A . Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(5):1283-1289.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003. View

11.

Bhide P, Srikantharajah A, Lanz D, Dodds J, Collins B, Zamora J . TILT: Time-Lapse Imaging Trial-a pragmatic, multi-centre, three-arm randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of time-lapse imaging in in vitro fertilisation treatment. Trials. 2020; 21(1):600. PMC: 7329433. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04537-2. View

12.

Mashiko D, Ikawa M, Fujimoto K . Mouse spermatozoa with higher fertilization rates have thinner nuclei. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e3913. PMC: 5641427. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3913. View

13.

Van den Abbeel E, Balaban B, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Cuesta M, Klein B . Association between blastocyst morphology and outcome of single-blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 27(4):353-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006. View

14.

Asada Y, Tokoro M, Sonohara M, Fukunaga N, Hattori Y, Hashiba Y . Long-term outcomes of freeze-all strategy: A retrospective analysis from a single ART center in Japan. Reprod Med Biol. 2019; 18(2):173-179. PMC: 6452015. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12264. View

15.

Korevaar T, Steegers E, de Rijke Y, Schalekamp-Timmermans S, Visser W, Hofman A . Reference ranges and determinants of total hCG levels during pregnancy: the Generation R Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015; 30(9):1057-66. PMC: 4584104. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-015-0039-0. View

16.

Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, Aparicio Ruiz B, Garcia Velasco J, Remohi J . The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection. Hum Reprod. 2014; 30(2):276-83. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu331. View

17.

Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman C . Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 26(5):477-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.006. View

18.

Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Zhan Q, Malmsten J, Toschi M, Zisimopoulos P . Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:21. PMC: 6550169. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y. View

19.

Tasdemir M, Tasdemir I, Kodama H, Fukuda J, Tanaka T . Two instead of three embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10(8):2155-8. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136252. View

20.

Jolliffe I, Cadima J . Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016; 374(2065):20150202. PMC: 4792409. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202. View