Language Entropy Relates to Behavioral and Pupil Indices of Executive Control in Young Adult Bilinguals

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2022 May 23

PMID 35602687

Authors

Floor van den Berg

Jelle Brouwer

Thomas B Tienkamp

Josje Verhagen

Merel Keijzer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: It has been proposed that bilinguals' language use patterns are differentially associated with executive control. To further examine this, the present study relates the social diversity of bilingual language use to performance on a color-shape switching task (CSST) in a group of bilingual university students with diverse linguistic backgrounds. Crucially, this study used language entropy as a measure of bilinguals' language use patterns. This continuous measure reflects a spectrum of language use in a variety of social contexts, ranging from compartmentalized use to fully integrated use.

Methods: Language entropy for university and non-university contexts was calculated from questionnaire data on language use. Reaction times (RTs) were measured to calculate global RT and switching and mixing costs on the CSST, representing conflict monitoring, mental set shifting, and goal maintenance, respectively. In addition, this study innovatively recorded a potentially more sensitive measure of set shifting abilities, namely, pupil size during task performance.

Results: Higher university entropy was related to slower global RT. Neither university entropy nor non-university entropy were associated with switching costs as manifested in RTs. However, bilinguals with more compartmentalized language use in non-university contexts showed a larger difference in pupil dilation for switch trials in comparison with non-switch trials. Mixing costs in RTs were reduced for bilinguals with higher diversity of language use in non-university contexts. No such effects were found for university entropy.

Discussion: These results point to the social diversity of bilinguals' language use as being associated with executive control, but the direction of the effects may depend on social context (university vs. non-university). Importantly, the results also suggest that some of these effects may only be detected by using more sensitive measures, such as pupil dilation. The paper discusses theoretical and practical implications regarding the language entropy measure and the cognitive effects of bilingual experiences more generally, as well as how methodological choices can advance our understanding of these effects.

Citing Articles

Language athletes: Dual-language code-switchers exhibit inhibitory control advantages.

Gosselin L, Sabourin L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1150159.

PMID: 37063556 PMC: 10102468. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150159.

References

Kalamala P, Szewczyk J, Chuderski A, Senderecka M, Wodniecka Z . Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis. Cognition. 2020; 204:104373. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104373. View

Luk G, Bialystok E . Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013; 25(5):605-621. PMC: 3780436. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.795574. View

Gullifer J, Chai X, Whitford V, Pivneva I, Baum S, Klein D . Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 117:123-134. PMC: 6086747. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.037. View

Beatty-Martinez A, Navarro-Torres C, Dussias P, Bajo M, Guzzardo Tamargo R, Kroll J . Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019; 46(6):1022-1047. PMC: 7117987. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000770. View

Hartanto A, Yang H . Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition. 2016; 150:10-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016. View

Bialystok E, Craik F, Luk G . Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(4):240-50. PMC: 3322418. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001. View

Gullifer J, Titone D . Bilingualism: A Neurocognitive Exercise in Managing Uncertainty. Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 2(4):464-486. PMC: 10158557. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00044. View

Hartanto A, Yang H . The role of bilingual interactional contexts in predicting interindividual variability in executive functions: A latent variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019; 149(4):609-633. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000672. View

Winn M, Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Kuchinsky S . Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518800869. PMC: 6166306. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518800869. View

10.

Li X, Ng K, Wong J, Lee J, Zhou J, Yow W . Bilingual language entropy influences executive functions through functional connectivity and signal variability. Brain Lang. 2021; 222:105026. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105026. View

11.

Mathot S, Fabius J, van Heusden E, Van der Stigchel S . Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data. Behav Res Methods. 2018; 50(1):94-106. PMC: 5809553. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-1007-2. View

12.

Anderson J, Mak L, Keyvani Chahi A, Bialystok E . The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(1):250-263. PMC: 5591752. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9. View

13.

Beatty-Martinez A, Titone D . The Quest for Signals in Noise: Leveraging Experiential Variation to Identify Bilingual Phenotypes. Languages (Basel). 2022; 6(4). PMC: 8975245. DOI: 10.3390/languages6040168. View

14.

DeLuca V, Rothman J, Bialystok E, Pliatsikas C . Duration and extent of bilingual experience modulate neurocognitive outcomes. Neuroimage. 2019; 204:116222. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116222. View

15.

Poarch G, Krott A . A Bilingual Advantage? An Appeal for a Change in Perspective and Recommendations for Future Research. Behav Sci (Basel). 2019; 9(9). PMC: 6769592. DOI: 10.3390/bs9090095. View

16.

Meulman N, Wieling M, Sprenger S, Stowe L, Schmid M . Age Effects in L2 Grammar Processing as Revealed by ERPs and How (Not) to Study Them. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0143328. PMC: 4686163. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143328. View

17.

Park D, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson N, Smith A, Smith P . Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging. 2002; 17(2):299-320. View

18.

van der Wel P, van Steenbergen H . Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018; 25(6):2005-2015. PMC: 6267528. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y. View

19.

Geller J, Winn M, Mahr T, Mirman D . GazeR: A Package for Processing Gaze Position and Pupil Size Data. Behav Res Methods. 2020; 52(5):2232-2255. PMC: 7544668. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01374-8. View

20.

Marian V, Blumenfeld H, Kaushanskaya M . The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50(4):940-67. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067). View