» Articles » PMID: 35600423

Technique-based Inoculation Against Real-world Misinformation

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 23
PMID 35600423
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, numerous psychological interventions have been developed to reduce susceptibility to misinformation. Inoculation theory has become an increasingly common framework for reducing susceptibility to both individual examples of misinformation (issue-based inoculation) and to the techniques and strategies that are commonly used to mislead or misinform people (technique-based inoculation). In this study, we address two open questions related to technique-based inoculation in two separate experiments (total = 2188; convenience sample recruited via the online game platform): (i) can technique-based inoculation effectively reduce susceptibility to real-world misinformation that went viral on social media? and (ii) can technique-based inoculation confer cross-protection against misinformation that does not make use of any of the techniques against which people were inoculated? We find that playing a 15 min game confers psychological resistance against real-world misinformation that makes use of manipulation techniques against which people were inoculated (Cohen's = 0.37, Cohen's = 64.4%, < 0.001), and that cross-protection is achieved but at a reduced effect size ( = 0.10, = 54.0%, = 0.001).

Citing Articles

Expressions of uncertainty in online science communication hinder information diffusion.

Stavrova O, Kleinberg B, Evans A, Ivanovic M PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(10):pgae439.

PMID: 39430220 PMC: 11489878. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae439.


The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility.

Traberg C, Harjani T, Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4205.

PMID: 38378750 PMC: 10879158. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54030-y.


Social media for public health: Reaping the benefits, mitigating the harms.

Jafar Z, Quick J, Larson H, Venegas-Vera V, Napoli P, Musuka G Health Promot Perspect. 2023; 13(2):105-112.

PMID: 37600540 PMC: 10439458. DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2023.13.


Recent trends in vaccine coverage and confidence: A cause for concern.

Eagan R, Larson H, de Figueiredo A Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023; 19(2):2237374.

PMID: 37526111 PMC: 10395254. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2237374.


Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic.

McPhedran R, Ratajczak M, Mawby M, King E, Yang Y, Gold N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5780.

PMID: 37031339 PMC: 10082776. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32962-1.


References
1.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

2.
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek S, de Graaf K, Larson H . Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(3):337-348. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. View

3.
Pennycook G, Rand D . Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2018; 188:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. View

4.
Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S . How to Combat Health Misinformation: A Psychological Approach. Am J Health Promot. 2022; 36(3):569-575. DOI: 10.1177/08901171211070958. View

5.
Cook J, Lewandowsky S, Ecker U . Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0175799. PMC: 5419564. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175799. View