» Articles » PMID: 35594402

Long-term Experimental Evolution Decouples Size and Production Costs in

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 20
PMID 35594402
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Body size covaries with population dynamics across life’s domains. Metabolism may impose fundamental constraints on the coevolution of size and demography, but experimental tests of the causal links remain elusive. We leverage a 60,000-generation experiment in which Escherichia coli populations evolved larger cells to examine intraspecific metabolic scaling and correlations with demographic parameters. Over the course of their evolution, the cells have roughly doubled in size relative to their ancestors. These larger cells have metabolic rates that are absolutely higher, but relative to their size, they are lower. Metabolic theory successfully predicted the relations between size, metabolism, and maximum population density, including support for Damuth’s law of energy equivalence, such that populations of larger cells achieved lower maximum densities but higher maximum biomasses than populations of smaller cells. The scaling of metabolism with cell size thus predicted the scaling of size with maximum population density. In stark contrast to standard theory, however, populations of larger cells grew faster than those of smaller cells, contradicting the fundamental and intuitive assumption that the costs of building new individuals should scale directly with their size. The finding that the costs of production can be decoupled from size necessitates a reevaluation of the evolutionary drivers and ecological consequences of biological size more generally.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary shift of a tipping point can precipitate, or forestall, collapse in a microbial community.

Blake C, Barber J, Connallon T, McDonald M Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(12):2325-2335.

PMID: 39294402 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02543-0.


The evolution of autonomy from two cooperative specialists in fluctuating environments.

Chen X, Wang M, Luo L, Liu X, An L, Nie Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(35):e2317182121.

PMID: 39172793 PMC: 11363282. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2317182121.


Per capita sperm metabolism is density dependent.

Potter A, White C, Marshall D J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(6).

PMID: 38380562 PMC: 11006396. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246674.


Consequences of the cost of living: is variation in metabolic rate evolutionarily significant?.

Pettersen A, Metcalfe N Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1896):20220498.

PMID: 38186277 PMC: 10772612. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0498.


Relationships between intrinsic population growth rate, carrying capacity and metabolism in microbial populations.

Marshall D, Cameron H, Loreau M ISME J. 2023; 17(12):2140-2143.

PMID: 37891425 PMC: 10689727. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-023-01543-5.


References
1.
Favate J, Liang S, Cope A, Yadavalli S, Shah P . The landscape of transcriptional and translational changes over 22 years of bacterial adaptation. Elife. 2022; 11. PMC: 9645810. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.81979. View

2.
Kozlowski J, Konarzewski M, Gawelczyk A . Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(24):14080-5. PMC: 283549. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2334605100. View

3.
Grant N, Abdel Magid A, Franklin J, Dufour Y, Lenski R . Changes in Cell Size and Shape during 50,000 Generations of Experimental Evolution with Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2021; 203(10). PMC: 8088598. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00469-20. View

4.
Malerba M, Palacios M, Marshall D . Do larger individuals cope with resource fluctuations better? An artificial selection approach. Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1884). PMC: 6111162. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1347. View

5.
Gardner J, Peters A, Kearney M, Joseph L, Heinsohn R . Declining body size: a third universal response to warming?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26(6):285-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.005. View