» Articles » PMID: 35591223

Selection of Noninvasive Features in Wrist-Based Wearable Sensors to Predict Blood Glucose Concentrations Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 May 20
PMID 35591223
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glucose monitoring technologies allow users to monitor glycemic fluctuations (e.g., blood glucose levels). This is particularly important for individuals who have diabetes mellitus (DM). Traditional self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) devices require the user to prick their finger and extract a blood drop to measure the blood glucose based on chemical reactions with the blood. Unlike traditional glucometer devices, noninvasive continuous glucose monitoring (NICGM) devices aim to solve these issues by consistently monitoring users' blood glucose levels (BGLs) without invasively acquiring a sample. In this work, we investigated the feasibility of a novel approach to NICGM using multiple off-the-shelf wearable sensors and learning-based models (i.e., machine learning) to predict blood glucose. Two datasets were used for this study: (1) the OhioT1DM dataset, provided by the Ohio University; and (2) the UofM dataset, created by our research team. The UofM dataset consists of fourteen features provided by six sensors for studying possible relationships between glucose and noninvasive biometric measurements. Both datasets are passed through a machine learning (ML) pipeline that tests linear and nonlinear models to predict BGLs from the set of noninvasive features. The results of this pilot study show that the combination of fourteen noninvasive biometric measurements with ML algorithms could lead to accurate BGL predictions within the clinical range; however, a larger dataset is required to make conclusions about the feasibility of this approach.

Citing Articles

AI-Based Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring: Scoping Review.

Chan P, Jin E, Jansson M, Chew H J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e58892.

PMID: 39561353 PMC: 11615544. DOI: 10.2196/58892.


Role of Machine Learning Assisted Biosensors in Point-of-Care-Testing For Clinical Decisions.

Bhaiyya M, Panigrahi D, Rewatkar P, Haick H ACS Sens. 2024; 9(9):4495-4519.

PMID: 39145721 PMC: 11443532. DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.4c01582.


Multimodal In-Vehicle Hypoglycemia Warning for Drivers With Type 1 Diabetes: Design and Evaluation in Simulated and Real-World Driving.

Berube C, Maritsch M, Lehmann V, Kraus M, Feuerriegel S, Zuger T JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e46967.

PMID: 38635313 PMC: 11066742. DOI: 10.2196/46967.


Non-Invasive Glucose Sensing Technologies and Products: A Comprehensive Review for Researchers and Clinicians.

Di Filippo D, Sunstrum F, Khan J, Welsh A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(22).

PMID: 38005523 PMC: 10674292. DOI: 10.3390/s23229130.

References
1.
SHUMAN C, SPRATT I . Office guide to diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes Care. 1981; 4(2):335. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.4.2.335. View

2.
Monte-Moreno E . Non-invasive estimate of blood glucose and blood pressure from a photoplethysmograph by means of machine learning techniques. Artif Intell Med. 2011; 53(2):127-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.05.001. View

3.
Harris C, Millman K, van der Walt S, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D . Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585(7825):357-362. PMC: 7759461. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. View

4.
Kudat H, Akkaya V, Sozen A, Salman S, Demirel S, Ozcan M . Heart rate variability in diabetes patients. J Int Med Res. 2006; 34(3):291-6. DOI: 10.1177/147323000603400308. View

5.
Forst T, Kann P, Pfutzner A, Lobmann R, Schafer H, Beyer J . Association between "diabetic thick skin syndrome" and neurological disorders in diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 1994; 31(2):73-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00570538. View