» Articles » PMID: 35588133

Electroporation-based Proteome Sampling Ex Vivo Enables the Detection of Brain Melanoma Protein Signatures in a Location Proximate to Visible Tumor Margins

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 May 19
PMID 35588133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A major concern in tissue biopsies with a needle is missing the most lethal clone of a tumor, leading to a false negative result. This concern is well justified, since needle-based biopsies gather tissue information limited to needle size. In this work, we show that molecular harvesting with electroporation, e-biopsy, could increase the sampled tissue volume in comparison to tissue sampling by a needle alone. Suggested by numerical models of electric fields distribution, the increased sampled volume is achieved by electroporation-driven permeabilization of cellular membranes in the tissue around the sampling needle. We show that proteomic profiles, sampled by e-biopsy from the brain tissue, ex vivo, at 0.5mm distance outside the visible margins of mice brain melanoma metastasis, have protein patterns similar to melanoma tumor center and different from the healthy brain tissue. In addition, we show that e-biopsy probed proteome signature differentiates between melanoma tumor center and healthy brain in mice. This study suggests that e-biopsy could provide a novel tool for a minimally invasive sampling of molecules in tissue in larger volumes than achieved with traditional needle biopsies.

Citing Articles

Differential Expression Analysis of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Basal Cell Carcinoma Proteomic Profiles Sampled with Electroporation-Based Biopsy.

Vitkin E, Wise J, Berl A, Shir-Az O, Gabay B, Singh A JID Innov. 2024; 4(6):100304.

PMID: 39497856 PMC: 11532231. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100304.


High-throughput lipidomic profiles sampled with electroporation-based biopsy differentiate healthy skin, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma.

Louie L, Wise J, Berl A, Shir-Az O, Kravtsov V, Yakhini Z Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(5):e13706.

PMID: 38721854 PMC: 11079884. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13706.


Genome Editing in Ferret Airway Epithelia Mediated by CRISPR/Nucleases Delivered with Amphiphilic Shuttle Peptides.

Luo M, Ma J, Cheng X, Wu S, Bartels D, Guay D Hum Gene Ther. 2023; 34(15-16):705-718.

PMID: 37335046 PMC: 10457657. DOI: 10.1089/hum.2023.016.


Electroporation-Based Biopsy Treatment Planning with Numerical Models and Tissue Phantoms.

Gabay B, Levkov K, Berl A, Wise J, Shir-Az O, Vitkin E Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 52(1):71-88.

PMID: 37154990 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03208-y.

References
1.
Garcia P, Davalos R, Miklavcic D . A numerical investigation of the electric and thermal cell kill distributions in electroporation-based therapies in tissue. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e103083. PMC: 4130512. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103083. View

2.
Wang Y, Gu X, Wang C, Wang H, Ni Q, Zhang C . The far-upstream element-binding protein 2 is correlated with proliferation and doxorubicin resistance in human breast cancer cell lines. Tumour Biol. 2016; 37(7):9755-69. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-4819-2. View

3.
corovic S, Lackovic I, Sustaric P, Sustar T, Rodic T, Miklavcic D . Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation. Biomed Eng Online. 2013; 12:16. PMC: 3614452. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-16. View

4.
Edd J, Horowitz L, Davalos R, Mir L, Rubinsky B . In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53(7):1409-15. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2006.873745. View

5.
Golberg A, Rubinsky B . Towards electroporation based treatment planning considering electric field induced muscle contractions. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 11(2):189-201. DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500249. View