» Articles » PMID: 35586738

Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Human Compared to a Non-intervention Diet and Caloric Restriction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2022 May 19
PMID 35586738
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The popularity of applying intermittent fasting (IF) has increased as more and more people are trying to avoid or alleviate obesity and metabolic disease. This study aimed to systematically explore the effects of various IF in humans.

Methods: The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to IF vs. non-intervention diet or caloric restriction (CR) were retrieved in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library database, and Embase. Extraction outcomes included, but were not limited to, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), fasting glucose, and triglyceride (TG).

Results: This study includes 43 RCTs with 2,483 participants. The intervention time was at least 1 month, and the median intervention time was 3 months. Contrasting results between IF and non-intervention diet showed that participants had lower weight (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.09-2.12, = 0.03) and BMI after IF (WMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.08-0.68, = 0.01). The WC of participants after IF decreased significantly compared with the non-intervention diet (WMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.06-1.99, = 0.04). IF regulated fat mass (FM) more effectively than non-intervention diet (WMD = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.17-1.31, = 0.01). The fat-free mass of people after IF was higher (WMD = -0.73, 95% CI: (-1.45)-(-0.02), = 0.05). There was no difference in fasting blood glucose concentrations between participants in the after IF and non-intervention diet groups. The results of insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR, though, indicated that IF was significantly more beneficial than non-intervention diet (standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.21, 95% CI: 0.02-0.40, = 0.03, and WMD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.04-0.65, = 0.03, respectively). Cholesterol and TG concentrations in participants after IF were also lower than that after a nonintervention diet (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09-0.35, = 0.001 and SMD = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.00-0.26, = 0.05, respectively). IF outcomes did not differ from CR except for reduced WC.

Conclusion: Intermittent fasting was more beneficial in reducing body weight, WC, and FM without affecting lean mass compared to the non-intervention diet. IF also effectively improved insulin resistance and blood lipid conditions compared with non-intervention diets. However, IF showed less benefit over CR.

Citing Articles

The research progress and prospects of circadian rhythm in obesity: a bibliometric analysis.

Dou Y, Guo X, Wang X, He A, Li F, Gao K Front Nutr. 2025; 11():1499984.

PMID: 39839286 PMC: 11745893. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1499984.


The Gut Microbiome's Influence on Incretins and Impact on Blood Glucose Control.

Dulai A, Min M, Sivamani R Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767626 PMC: 11727616. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122719.


Efficacy of intermittent fasting on improving liver function in individuals with metabolic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khalafi M, Rosenkranz S, Ghasemi F, Kheradmand S, Habibi Maleki A, Korivi M Nutr Metab (Lond). 2025; 22(1):1.

PMID: 39762987 PMC: 11706068. DOI: 10.1186/s12986-024-00885-x.


Intermittent fasting reduces inflammation and joint damage in a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis: insights from transcriptomic and metagenomic analyses.

Cuevas-Martinez R, Gonzalez-Chavez S, Bermudez M, Salas-Leiva J, Vazquez-Olvera G, Hinojos-Gallardo L BMC Rheumatol. 2024; 8(1):64.

PMID: 39587696 PMC: 11587710. DOI: 10.1186/s41927-024-00436-0.


Effects of different types of intermittent fasting on metabolic outcomes: an umbrella review and network meta-analysis.

Chen Y, Tsai H, Tu Y, Chen L BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):529.

PMID: 39533312 PMC: 11559166. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03716-1.


References
1.
Gabel K, Kroeger C, Trepanowski J, Hoddy K, Cienfuegos S, Kalam F . Differential Effects of Alternate-Day Fasting Versus Daily Calorie Restriction on Insulin Resistance. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019; 27(9):1443-1450. PMC: 7138754. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22564. View

2.
Omodei D, Fontana L . Calorie restriction and prevention of age-associated chronic disease. FEBS Lett. 2011; 585(11):1537-42. PMC: 3439843. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.015. View

3.
Challet E . The circadian regulation of food intake. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019; 15(7):393-405. DOI: 10.1038/s41574-019-0210-x. View

4.
Tinsley G, Forsse J, Butler N, Paoli A, Bane A, La Bounty P . Time-restricted feeding in young men performing resistance training: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016; 17(2):200-207. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1223173. View

5.
Linden Hirschberg A . Sex hormones, appetite and eating behaviour in women. Maturitas. 2012; 71(3):248-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.12.016. View