» Articles » PMID: 35584881

Stroke Volume Variation for Predicting Responsiveness to Fluid Therapy in Patients Undergoing Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 May 18
PMID 35584881
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of stroke volume variation (SVV) for predicting responsiveness to fluid therapy in patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic surgery.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science up to 9 August 2020.

Methods: Quality of included studies were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. We conducted subgroup analysis according to different anaesthesia and surgical methods with Stata V.14.0, Review Manager V.5.3 and R V.3.6.3. We used random-effects model to pool sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio with 95% CI. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic was calculated.

Results: Among the 20 relevant studies, 7 were conducted during thoracic surgery, 8 were conducted during cardiac surgery and the remaining 5 were conducted in intensive critical unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. Data from 854 patients accepting mechanical ventilation were included in our systematic review. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.83) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.46 to 0.76) in the thoracic surgery group, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.77) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.82) in the cardiac surgery group, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.96) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.92) in cardiac ICU group. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.77), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.83) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.92), respectively. Results of subgroup of FloTrac/Vigileo system (AUC=0.80, Youden index=0.38) and large tidal volume (AUC=0.81, Youden index=0.48) in thoracic surgery, colloid (AUC=0.85, Youden index=0.55) and postoperation (AUC=0.85, Youden index=0.63) in cardiac surgery, passive leg raising (AUC=0.90, Youden index=0.72) in cardiac ICU were reliable.

Conclusion: SVV had good predictive performance in cardiac surgery or ICU after cardiac surgery and had moderate predictive performance in thoracic surgery. Nevertheless, technical and clinical variables may affect the predictive value potentially.

Citing Articles

Impact of staged goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Yang C, Shi Y, Zhang M, Yang Y, Xie Y BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):330.

PMID: 39289608 PMC: 11406780. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02719-y.


Leveraging Hypotension Prediction Index to Forecast LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury and Inflammation in a Porcine Model: Exploring the Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor in Circulatory Shock.

Tsai Y, Lin Y, Chen C, Chien H, Chang H, Chiang M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200130 PMC: 11351327. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081665.


Revitalizing Postoperative Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery via Inter-departmental Collaboration Toward Precision Medicine: A Narrative Review.

Komasawa N Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e59031.

PMID: 38800337 PMC: 11127797. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59031.


Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alvarado Sanchez J, Caicedo Ruiz J, Diaztagle Fernandez J, Cruz Martinez L, Hernandez F, Santacruz Herrera C Crit Care. 2023; 27(1):361.

PMID: 37730622 PMC: 10510289. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04629-w.


Prediction of hypotension during the alveolar recruitment maneuver in spine surgery: a prospective observational study.

Min J, Chang H, Kim S, Cha S, Jeon J, Kim C Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):64.

PMID: 36732838 PMC: 9896773. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01031-8.

References
1.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B . Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(19):1368-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307. View

2.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

3.
Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Micaux Y, Levrard M, Airapetian N, Hijazi M . Accuracy of automated continuous calculation of pulse pressure variation in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 37(2):360-1. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2064-5. View

4.
Ribaric S, Kordas M . Simulation of the Frank-Starling Law of the Heart. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012; 2012:267834. PMC: 3517855. DOI: 10.1155/2012/267834. View

5.
Stuck A, Rubenstein L, Wieland D . Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity. BMJ. 1998; 316(7129):469; author reply 470-1. PMC: 2665578. View