» Articles » PMID: 35584530

Virtual Reality As a Distraction Therapy During Cystoscopy: a Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 May 18
PMID 35584530
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: to investigate whether virtual reality (VR) experience is associated with decreased pain sensation among patients who undergo rigid cystoscopy under local anesthesia.

Methods: we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 159 patients who were aleatorily enrolled into two groups: VR and control. VR experience intervention consisted of using a headset with a smartphone adapted to a virtual reality glasses where an app-video was played during the procedure. Main outcomes analyzed were pain, discomfort, heart rate variability, difficulty and duration of the cystoscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student's t test, Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: among 159 patients studied (VR group=80 patients; control group=79 patients), the mean age was 63,6 years and 107 (67,3%) were male. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. VR was significantly associated to decreased heart rate variability (6,29 vs 11,09 bpm, P<0,001) and lower duration of the procedure (5,33 vs 8,65 min, P<0,001). Also, when cystoscopies due to double-J extraction were excluded, VR experience was associated with reduced pain on the visual analog score of pain (3,26 vs 4,33 cm, P=0,023).

Conclusions: the use of VR as a distraction therapy while performing outpatient cystoscopies is safe, has no side effects, is associated with less pain and discomfort, and reduces length of procedure.

Citing Articles

Distraction Therapies for Office-Based Otolaryngology Procedures Performed on the Upper Airway.

Curry T, Lasso A, Kilty S Clin Otolaryngol. 2024; 50(2):241-248.

PMID: 39716942 PMC: 11792434. DOI: 10.1111/coa.14270.


Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.

Checcucci E, Piana A, Volpi G, Quara A, De Cillis S, Piramide F Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(10):3109-3134.

PMID: 38589511 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06699-6.


Efficacy of virtual reality for pain relief in medical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Teh J, Pascoe D, Hafeji S, Parchure R, Koczoski A, Rimmer M BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):64.

PMID: 38355563 PMC: 10865524. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03266-6.

References
1.
Niharika P, Reddy N, Srujana P, Srikanth K, Daneswari V, Geetha K . Effects of distraction using virtual reality technology on pain perception and anxiety levels in children during pulp therapy of primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018; 36(4):364-369. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_1158_17. View

2.
Glennon C, McElroy S, Connelly L, Lawson L, Bretches A, Gard A . Use of Virtual Reality to Distract From Pain and Anxiety. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018; 45(4):545-552. DOI: 10.1188/18.ONF.545-552. View

3.
Do A, Enax-Krumova E, Ozgul O, Eitner L, Heba S, Tegenthoff M . Distraction by a cognitive task has a higher impact on electrophysiological measures compared with conditioned pain modulation. BMC Neurosci. 2020; 21(1):53. PMC: 7720448. DOI: 10.1186/s12868-020-00604-1. View

4.
de Oliveira Freitas D, Spadoni V . Is virtual reality useful for pain management in patients who undergo medical procedures?. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019; 17(2):eMD4837. PMC: 6533080. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2019MD4837. View

5.
Mahrer N, Gold J . The use of virtual reality for pain control: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009; 13(2):100-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-009-0019-8. View