Distraction by a Cognitive Task Has a Higher Impact on Electrophysiological Measures Compared with Conditioned Pain Modulation

Overview

Journal BMC Neurosci

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Neurology

Date 2020 Dec 8

PMID 33287715

Citations 7

Authors

A T L Do

E K Enax-Krumova

O Ozgul

L B Eitner

S Heba

M Tegenthoff

C Maier

O Hoffken

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) evaluates the effect of a painful conditioning stimulus (CS) on a painful test stimulus (TS). Using painful cutaneous electrical stimulation (PCES) as TS and painful cold water as CS, the pain relief was paralleled by a decrease in evoked potentials (PCES-EPs). We now aimed to compare the effect of CPM with cognitive distraction on PCES-induced pain and PCES-EP amplitudes.

Methods: PCES was performed using surface electrodes inducing a painful sensation of 60 (NRS 0-100) on one hand. In a crossover design healthy subjects (included: n = 38, analyzed: n = 23) immersed the contralateral hand into 10 °C cold water (CS) for CPM evaluation and performed the 1-back task for cognitive distraction. Before and during the CS and 1-back task, respectively, subjects rated the pain intensity of PCES and simultaneously cortical evoked potentials were recorded.

Results: Both CPM and cognitive distraction significantly reduced PCES-EP amplitudes (CPM: 27.6 ± 12.0 μV to 20.2 ± 9.5 μV, cognitive distraction: 30.3 ± 14.2 µV to 13.6 ± 5.2 μV, p < 0.001) and PCES-induced pain (on a 0-100 numerical rating scale: CPM: 58 ± 4 to 41.1 ± 12.3, cognitive distraction: 58.3 ± 4.4 to 38.0 ± 13.0, p < 0.001), though the changes in pain intensity and PCES-amplitude did not correlate. The changes of the PCES-EP amplitudes during cognitive distraction were more pronounced than during CPM (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: CPM and cognitive distraction reduced the PCES-induced pain to a similar extent. The more pronounced decrease of PCES-EP amplitudes after distraction by a cognitive task implies that both conditions might not represent the general pain modulatory capacity of individuals, but may underlie different neuronal mechanisms with the final common pathway of perceived pain reduction.

Citing Articles

Posttraumatic headache: pain related evoked potentials (PREP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) to assess the pain modulatory function.

Jessen J, Hoffken O, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M, Ozgul O, Enax-Krumova E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16306.

PMID: 39009744 PMC: 11251016. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67288-z.

Effect of Mirror Therapy on Post-Needling Pain Following Deep Dry Needling of Myofascial Trigger Point in Lateral Elbow Pain: Prospective Controlled Pilot Trial.

Martin Perez S, Rodriguez J, Kalitovics A, de Miguel Rodriguez P, Bortolussi Cegarra D, Rodriguez Villanueva I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592311 PMC: 10934708. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051490.

Involvement of propriospinal processes in conditioned pain modulation.

Nahman-Averbuch H, Piche M, Bannister K, Coghill R Pain. 2024; 165(9):1907-1913.

PMID: 38537057 PMC: 11333191. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003217.

Insights into pain distraction and the impact of pain catastrophizing on pain perception during different types of distraction tasks.

Asefi Rad A, Wippert P Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024; 5:1266974.

PMID: 38322588 PMC: 10844527. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1266974.

Anti- and Pro-Nociceptive mechanisms in neuropathic pain after human spinal cord injury.

Lutolf R, De Schoenmacker I, Rosner J, Sirucek L, Schweinhardt P, Curt A Eur J Pain. 2022; 26(10):2176-2187.

PMID: 36000307 PMC: 9826499. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2029.

References

Ohara P, Vit J, Jasmin L . Cortical modulation of pain. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004; 62(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-004-4283-9. View

Lavie N . Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(2):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004. View

Pud D, Sprecher E, Yarnitsky D . Homotopic and heterotopic effects of endogenous analgesia in healthy volunteers. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 380(3):209-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.01.037. View

Edwards R, Ness T, Weigent D, Fillingim R . Individual differences in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC): association with clinical variables. Pain. 2003; 106(3):427-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.005. View

Vaegter H, Fehrmann E, Gajsar H, Kreddig N . Endogenous Modulation of Pain: The Role of Exercise, Stress, and Cognitions in Humans. Clin J Pain. 2019; 36(3):150-161. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000788. View

Staud R, Robinson M, Vierck Jr C, Price D . Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) attenuate temporal summation of second pain in normal males but not in normal females or fibromyalgia patients. Pain. 2003; 101(1-2):167-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00325-1. View

Lorenz J, Minoshima S, Casey K . Keeping pain out of mind: the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in pain modulation. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 5):1079-91. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg102. View

Hoffman H, Sharar S, Coda B, Everett J, Ciol M, Richards T . Manipulating presence influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. Pain. 2004; 111(1-2):162-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.013. View

KIRCHNER W . Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J Exp Psychol. 1958; 55(4):352-8. DOI: 10.1037/h0043688. View

10.

Youssef A, Macefield V, Henderson L . Pain inhibits pain; human brainstem mechanisms. Neuroimage. 2015; 124(Pt A):54-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.060. View

11.

Katsarava Z, Ayzenberg I, Sack F, Limmroth V, Diener H, Kaube H . A novel method of eliciting pain-related potentials by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Headache. 2006; 46(10):1511-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00446.x. View

12.

Lewis G, Rice D, McNair P . Conditioned pain modulation in populations with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2012; 13(10):936-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.07.005. View

13.

Moont R, Pud D, Sprecher E, Sharvit G, Yarnitsky D . 'Pain inhibits pain' mechanisms: Is pain modulation simply due to distraction?. Pain. 2010; 150(1):113-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.009. View

14.

Sprenger C, Eippert F, Finsterbusch J, Bingel U, Rose M, Buchel C . Attention modulates spinal cord responses to pain. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(11):1019-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.006. View

15.

Yarnitsky D, Crispel Y, Eisenberg E, Granovsky Y, Ben-Nun A, Sprecher E . Prediction of chronic post-operative pain: pre-operative DNIC testing identifies patients at risk. Pain. 2007; 138(1):22-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.033. View

16.

Yarnitsky D . Role of endogenous pain modulation in chronic pain mechanisms and treatment. Pain. 2015; 156 Suppl 1:S24-S31. DOI: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460343.46847.58. View

17.

Petrovic P, Ingvar M . Imaging cognitive modulation of pain processing. Pain. 2002; 95(1-2):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00467-5. View

18.

Cadden S, Villanueva L, Chitour D, LE Bars D . Depression of activities of dorsal horn convergent neurones by propriospinal mechanisms triggered by noxious inputs; comparison with diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). Brain Res. 1983; 275(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90412-2. View

19.

Pud D, Granovsky Y, Yarnitsky D . The methodology of experimentally induced diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC)-like effect in humans. Pain. 2009; 144(1-2):16-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.015. View

20.

Yamasaki H, Kakigi R, Watanabe S, Hoshiyama M . Effects of distraction on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following painful electrical stimulation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000; 9(2):165-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00056-7. View