» Articles » PMID: 35579100

Proarrhythmic Risk Assessment of Drugs by DV /dt Shapes Using the Convolutional Neural Network

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 May 17
PMID 35579100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) projects for assessing proarrhythmic drugs suggested a logistic regression model using qNet as the Torsades de Pointes (TdP) risk assessment biomarker, obtained from in silico simulation. However, using a single in silico feature, such as qNet, cannot reflect whole characteristics related to TdP in the entire action potential (AP) shape. Thus, this study proposed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model using differential action potential shapes to classify three proarrhythmic risk levels: high, intermediate, and low, considering both characteristics related to TdP not only in the depolarization phase but also the repolarization phase of AP shape. We performed an in silico simulation and got AP shapes with drug effects using half-maximal inhibitory concentration and Hill coefficients of 28 drugs released by CiPA groups. Then, we trained the deep CNN model with the differential AP shapes of 12 drugs and tested it with those of 16 drugs. Our model had a better performance for classifying the proarrhythmic risk of drugs than the traditional logistic regression model using qNet. The classification accuracy was 98% for high-risk level drugs, 94% for intermediate-risk level drugs, and 89% for low-risk level drugs.

Citing Articles

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to find optimal in-silico biomarkers for cardiac drug toxicity evaluation.

Pramudito M, Fuadah Y, Qauli A, Marcellinus A, Lim K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24045.

PMID: 39402077 PMC: 11473646. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71169-w.


A stacking ensemble machine learning model for evaluating cardiac toxicity of drugs based on in silico biomarkers.

Fuadah Y, Qauli A, Pramudito M, Marcellinus A, Hanum U, Lim K CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(12):2159-2170.

PMID: 39185761 PMC: 11646942. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13229.


Neural network emulation of the human ventricular cardiomyocyte action potential for more efficient computations in pharmacological studies.

Grandits T, Augustin C, Haase G, Jost N, Mirams G, Niederer S Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38598284 PMC: 11006416. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91911.


Neural network emulation of the human ventricular cardiomyocyte action potential: a tool for more efficient computation in pharmacological studies.

Grandits T, Augustin C, Haase G, Jost N, Mirams G, Niederer S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38234850 PMC: 10793461. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.16.553497.


Assessment of the proarrhythmic effects of repurposed antimalarials for COVID-19 treatment using a comprehensive proarrhythmia assay (CiPA).

Yoon S, Lee H, Jeong D, Lim K, Park S, Kim K Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1220796.

PMID: 37649890 PMC: 10464612. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1220796.


References
1.
Li Z, Dutta S, Sheng J, Tran P, Wu W, Chang K . Improving the In Silico Assessment of Proarrhythmia Risk by Combining hERG (Human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene) Channel-Drug Binding Kinetics and Multichannel Pharmacology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017; 10(2):e004628. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004628. View

2.
McCabe S, Lin D, Love M . Consistency and overfitting of multi-omics methods on experimental data. Brief Bioinform. 2019; 21(4):1277-1284. PMC: 7373174. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz070. View

3.
Lancaster M, Sobie E . Improved Prediction of Drug-Induced Torsades de Pointes Through Simulations of Dynamics and Machine Learning Algorithms. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 100(4):371-9. PMC: 6375298. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.367. View

4.
Margara F, Wang Z, Levrero-Florencio F, Santiago A, Vazquez M, Bueno-Orovio A . In-silico human electro-mechanical ventricular modelling and simulation for drug-induced pro-arrhythmia and inotropic risk assessment. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2020; 159:58-74. PMC: 7848595. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.06.007. View

5.
Onakpoya I, Heneghan C, Aronson J . Post-marketing withdrawal of 462 medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of the world literature. BMC Med. 2016; 14:10. PMC: 4740994. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0553-2. View