Influence of Thread Design on Anchorage of Pedicle Screws in Cancellous Bone: an Experimental and Analytical Analysis

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2022 May 16

PMID 35577852

Authors

Martin Weidling

Martin Heilemann

Stephan Schoenfelder

Christoph E Heyde

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Threads of modern pedicle screws can vary greatly in design. It is difficult to assess which interplay of design features is particularly advantageous for screw anchorage. This study aims to increase the understanding of the anchorage behaviour between screw and cancellous bone. Pull-out tests of six pedicle screws in two sizes each were performed on three densities of biomechanical test material. More general screw characteristics were derived from the screw design and evaluated using the test data. Selected screws were tested on body donor material. Some screw characteristics, such as compacting, are well suited to compare the different thread designs of screws with tapered core. The combination of two characteristics, one representing bone compacting and one representing thread flank area, appears to be particularly advantageous for assessing anchorage behaviour. With an equation derived from these characteristics, the pull-out strength could be calculated very accurately (mean deviation 1%). Furthermore, findings are corroborated by tests on donor material. For screws with tapered core, the design demands for good anchorage against pull-out from cancellous bone change with material density. With sufficient bone quality, screws with a high compacting effect are advantageous, while with low bone density a high thread flank area also appears necessary for better screw anchorage.

References

Szivek J, Thomas M, Benjamin J . Characterization of a synthetic foam as a model for human cancellous bone. J Appl Biomater. 1993; 4(3):269-72. DOI: 10.1002/jab.770040309. View

Weinstein J, Rydevik B, Rauschning W . Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (284):34-46. View

Amaritsakul Y, Chao C, Lin J . Comparison study of the pullout strength of conventional spinal pedicle screws and a novel design in full and backed-out insertions using mechanical tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014; 228(3):250-7. DOI: 10.1177/0954411914522437. View

Marie-Hardy L, Pascal-Moussellard H, Barnaba A, Bonaccorsi R, Scemama C . Screw Loosening in Posterior Spine Fusion: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(5):598-602. PMC: 7359691. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219864341. View

Misenhimer G, Peek R, Wiltse L, Rothman S, Widell Jr E . Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989; 14(4):367-72. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198904000-00004. View

Krenn M, Piotrowski W, Penzkofer R, Augat P . Influence of thread design on pedicle screw fixation. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008; 9(1):90-5. DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/090. View

Cho W, Cho S, Wu C . The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(8):1061-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24237. View

Inceoglu S, Ferrara L, McLain R . Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque. Spine J. 2004; 4(5):513-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.02.006. View

Carmouche J, Molinari R, Gerlinger T, DeVine J, Patience T . Effects of pilot hole preparation technique on pedicle screw fixation in different regions of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 3(5):364-70. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.5.0364. View

10.

Zdeblick T, Kunz D, Cooke M, McCabe R . Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(12):1673-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00016. View

11.

Weidling M, Wendler T, Schoenfelder S, Heyde C . Recommendations for standardised screw pull-out from polyurethane foam - The influence of density variations of the test foam and the insertion method. Med Eng Phys. 2022; 100:103750. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103750. View

12.

Shea T, Laun J, Gonzalez-Blohm S, Doulgeris J, Lee 3rd W, Aghayev K . Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:748393. PMC: 3958762. DOI: 10.1155/2014/748393. View

13.

Takenaka S, Kaito T, Ishii K, Watanabe K, Watanabe K, Shinohara A . Influence of novel design alteration of pedicle screw on pull-out strength: A finite element study. J Orthop Sci. 2019; 25(1):66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.002. View

14.

Santoni B, Hynes R, McGilvray K, Rodriguez-Canessa G, LYONS A, Henson M . Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2008; 9(5):366-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. View

15.

Hsu C, Chao C, Wang J, Hou S, Tsai Y, Lin J . Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(4):788-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.11.002. View

16.

Asnis S, Ernberg J, Bostrom M, Wright T, Harrington R, Tencer A . Cancellous bone screw thread design and holding power. J Orthop Trauma. 1996; 10(7):462-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199610000-00003. View

17.

Szivek J, Thompson J, Benjamin J . Characterization of three formulations of a synthetic foam as models for a range of human cancellous bone types. J Appl Biomater. 1995; 6(2):125-8. DOI: 10.1002/jab.770060207. View

18.

Varghese V, Ramu P, Krishnan V, Saravana Kumar G . Pull out strength calculator for pedicle screws using a surrogate ensemble approach. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017; 137:11-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.08.023. View

19.

Ohba T, Ebata S, Oba H, Koyama K, Haro H . Risk Factors for Clinically Relevant Loosening of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019; 3(1):79-85. PMC: 6690121. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0018. View

20.

Zindrick M, Wiltse L, Doornik A, Widell E, Knight G, Patwardhan A . Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(2):160-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198703000-00012. View