» Articles » PMID: 35573282

First Food and Drug Administration Cleared Thin-Film Electrode for Intracranial Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity-Part 1: Biocompatibility Testing

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2022 May 16
PMID 35573282
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Subdural strip and grid invasive electroencephalography electrodes are routinely used for surgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Although these electrodes have been in the United States market for decades (first FDA clearance 1985), their fabrication, materials, and properties have hardly changed. Existing commercially available electrodes are made of silicone, are thick (>0.5 mm), and do not optimally conform to brain convolutions. New thin-film polyimide electrodes (0.08 mm) have been manufactured to address these issues. While different thin-film electrodes are available for research use, to date, only one electrode is cleared by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in clinical practice. This study describes the biocompatibility tests that led to this clearance. Biocompatibility was tested using standard methods according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993. Electrodes and appropriate control materials were bent, folded, and placed in the appropriate extraction vehicles, or implanted. The extracts were used for and tests, to assess the effects of any potential extractable and leachable materials that may be toxic to the body. studies included cytotoxicity tested in L929 cell line, genotoxicity tested using mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) and Ames assay, and hemolysis tested in rabbit whole blood samples. The results indicated that the electrodes were non-cytotoxic, non-mutagenic, non-clastogenic, and non-hemolytic. studies included sensitization tested in guinea pigs, irritation tested in rabbits, acute systemic toxicity testing in mice, pyrogenicity tested in rabbits, and a prolonged 28-day subdural implant in sheep. The results indicated that the electrodes induced no sensitization and irritation, no weight loss, and no temperature increase. Histological examination of the sheep brain tissue showed no or minimal immune cell accumulation, necrosis, neovascularization, fibrosis, and astrocyte infiltration, with no differences from the control material. In summary, biocompatibility studies indicated that these new thin-film electrodes are appropriate for human use. As a result, the electrodes were cleared by the FDA for use in clinical practice [510(k) K192764], making it the first thin-film subdural electrode to progress from research to clinic. Its readiness as a commercial product ensures availability to all patients undergoing surgical evaluation for DRE.

Citing Articles

Biomaterials for neuroengineering: applications and challenges.

Wu H, Feng E, Yin H, Zhang Y, Chen G, Zhu B Regen Biomater. 2025; 12:rbae137.

PMID: 40007617 PMC: 11855295. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae137.


Challenges and opportunities of acquiring cortical recordings for chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation.

Herron J, Kullmann A, Denison T, Goodman W, Gunduz A, Neumann W Nat Biomed Eng. 2024; .

PMID: 39730913 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-024-01314-3.


Polyimide as a biomedical material: advantages and applications.

Shu J, Zhou Z, Liang H, Yang X Nanoscale Adv. 2024; 6(17):4309-4324.

PMID: 39170974 PMC: 11334982. DOI: 10.1039/d4na00292j.


The application of impantable sensors in the musculoskeletal system: a review.

Wang J, Chu J, Song J, Li Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1270237.

PMID: 38328442 PMC: 10847584. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1270237.


Electrochemical Testing of a New Polyimide Thin Film Electrode for Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity.

Ong S, Kullmann A, Mertens S, Rosa D, Diaz-Botia C Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(10).

PMID: 36296151 PMC: 9611492. DOI: 10.3390/mi13101798.

References
1.
Weremfo A, Carter P, Hibbert D, Zhao C . Investigating the interfacial properties of electrochemically roughened platinum electrodes for neural stimulation. Langmuir. 2015; 31(8):2593-9. DOI: 10.1021/la504876n. View

2.
Sun Y, Lacour S, Brooks R, Rushton N, Fawcett J, Cameron R . Assessment of the biocompatibility of photosensitive polyimide for implantable medical device use. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 90(3):648-55. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32125. View

3.
Geddes L, Roeder R . Criteria for the selection of materials for implanted electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003; 31(7):879-90. DOI: 10.1114/1.1581292. View

4.
Magnusson B, Kligman A . The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J Invest Dermatol. 1969; 52(3):268-76. DOI: 10.1038/jid.1969.42. View

5.
Vomero M, Cruz M, Zucchini E, Ciarpella F, Delfino E, Carli S . Conformable polyimide-based μECoGs: Bringing the electrodes closer to the signal source. Biomaterials. 2020; 255:120178. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120178. View