» Articles » PMID: 35566810

Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo-A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 May 14
PMID 35566810
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: When trying to modify urinary stents, certain pre-clinical steps have to be followed before clinical evaluation in humans. Usually, the process starts as an in silico assessment. The urinary tract is a highly complex, dynamic and variable environment, which makes a computer simulation closely reflecting physiological conditions extremely challenging. Therefore, the pre-clinical evaluation needs to go through further steps of in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assessments. : Within the European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS), the authors summarized and evaluated stent assessment models in silico, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. The topic and relevant sub-topics were researched in a systematic literature search in Embase, Scope, Web of Science and PubMed. Clinicaltrials.gov was consulted for ongoing trials. Articles were selected systematically according to guidelines with non-relevant, non-complete, and non-English or Spanish language articles excluded. : In the first part of this paper, we critically evaluate in vitro stent assessment models used over the last five decades, outlining briefly their strengths and weaknesses. In the second part, we provide a step-by-step guide on what to consider when setting up an ex vivo model for stent evaluation on the example of a biodegradable stent. Lastly, the third part lists and discusses the pros and cons of available animal models for urinary stent evaluation, this being the final step before human trials. : We hope that this overview can provide a practical guide and a critical discussion of the experimental pre-clinical evaluation steps needed, which will help interested readers in choosing the right methodology from the start of a stent evaluation process once an in silico assessment has been completed. Only a transparent multidisciplinary approach using the correct methodology will lead to a successful clinical implementation of any new or modified stent.

Citing Articles

Advances in experimental bladder models: bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo approaches for investigating urinary tract infections.

Nissanka M, Dilhari A, Wijesinghe G, Weerasekera M BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):206.

PMID: 39313789 PMC: 11418205. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01590-w.


Establishment of an artificial urine model in vitro and rat or pig model in vivo to evaluate urinary crystal adherence.

Hayashi K, Shigemura K, Tanimoto H, Kumagai K, Gonzales R, Yang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12001.

PMID: 38796538 PMC: 11127959. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62766-w.


An Evaluation of Parylene Thin Films to Prevent Encrustation for a Urinary Bladder Pressure MEMS Sensor System.

Buchwalder S, Hersberger M, Rebl H, Seemann S, Kram W, Hogg A Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(17).

PMID: 37688185 PMC: 10490164. DOI: 10.3390/polym15173559.


Interactive Effects of Copper-Doped Urological Implants with Tissue in the Urinary Tract for the Inhibition of Cell Adhesion and Encrustation in the Animal Model Rat.

Kram W, Rebl H, de la Cruz J, Haag A, Renner J, Epting T Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36015581 PMC: 9412396. DOI: 10.3390/polym14163324.

References
1.
Novick A, Szilard L . Description of the chemostat. Science. 1950; 112(2920):715-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.112.2920.715. View

2.
Pereira-Sampaio M, Favorito L, Sampaio F . Pig kidney: anatomical relationships between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. Applied study for urological research and surgical training. J Urol. 2004; 172(5 Pt 1):2077-81. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000138085.19352.b5. View

3.
Venkatesh R, Landman J, Minor S, Lee D, Rehman J, Vanlangendonck R . Impact of a double-pigtail stent on ureteral peristalsis in the porcine model: initial studies using a novel implantable magnetic sensor. J Endourol. 2005; 19(2):170-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.170. View

4.
Sun F, Baez-Diaz C, Sanchez-Margallo F . Canine prostate models in preclinical studies of minimally invasive interventions: part I, canine prostate anatomy and prostate cancer models. Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(3):538-546. PMC: 5503961. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.61. View

5.
Liatsikos E, Karnabatidis D, Kagadis G, Rokkas K, Constantinides C, Christeas N . Application of paclitaxel-eluting metal mesh stents within the pig ureter: an experimental study. Eur Urol. 2006; 51(1):217-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.054. View