» Articles » PMID: 26486777

Analysis of Animal Research Ethics Committee Membership at American Institutions

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2015 Oct 22
PMID 26486777
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) were created to review, approve and oversee animal experiments and to balance the interests of researchers, animals, institutions and the general public. This study analyzed the overall membership of IACUCs at leading U.S. research institutions. We found that these committees and their leadership are comprised of a preponderance of animal researchers, as well as other members who are affiliated with each institution; some of whom also work in animal laboratories. This overwhelming presence of animal research and institutional interests may dilute input from the few IACUC members representing animal welfare and the general public, contribute to previously-documented committee bias in favor of approving animal experiments and reduce the overall objectivity and effectiveness of the oversight system.

Citing Articles

Interdisciplinary Animal Research Ethics-Challenges, Opportunities, and Perspectives.

Mertz M, Hetzel T, Alex K, Braun K, Camenzind S, Dodaro R Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39409845 PMC: 11475729. DOI: 10.3390/ani14192896.


Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo-A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative.

Buchholz N, Budia A, Cruz J, Kram W, Humphreys O, Reches M Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 35566810 PMC: 9102855. DOI: 10.3390/polym14091641.


Public consultation in the evaluation of animal research protocols.

Brunt M, Weary D PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0260114.

PMID: 34851985 PMC: 8635329. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260114.


Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden.

Jorgensen S, Lindsjo J, Weber E, Rocklinsberg H Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(3).

PMID: 33807898 PMC: 8002130. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030708.


Animal Research, Accountability, Openness and Public Engagement: Report from an International Expert Forum.

Ormandy E, Weary D, Cvek K, Fisher M, Herrmann K, Hobson-West P Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(9).

PMID: 31470523 PMC: 6769554. DOI: 10.3390/ani9090622.


References
1.
Plous S, Herzog H . Animal research. Reliability of protocol reviews for animal research. Science. 2001; 293(5530):608-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1061621. View

2.
Houde L, Dumas C, Leroux T . Animal ethical evaluation: an observational study of Canadian IACUCs. Ethics Behav. 2004; 13(4):333-50. DOI: 10.1207/S15327019EB1304_2. View

3.
Hagelin J, Hau J, Carlsson H . The refining influence of ethics committees on animal experimentation in Sweden. Lab Anim. 2003; 37(1):10-8. DOI: 10.1258/002367703762226656. View

4.
Holden C . A pivotal year for lab animal welfare. Science. 1986; 232(4747):147-50. DOI: 10.1126/science.3952503. View

5.
Gomez L, Conlee K, Stephens M . Noncompliance with Public Health Service (PHS) policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals: an exploratory analysis. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2010; 13(2):123-36. DOI: 10.1080/10888700903579838. View