» Articles » PMID: 35565673

Prospects and Pitfalls of Machine Learning in Nutritional Epidemiology

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2022 May 14
PMID 35565673
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nutritional epidemiology employs observational data to discover associations between diet and disease risk. However, existing analytic methods of dietary data are often sub-optimal, with limited incorporation and analysis of the correlations between the studied variables and nonlinear behaviours in the data. Machine learning (ML) is an area of artificial intelligence that has the potential to improve modelling of nonlinear associations and confounding which are found in nutritional data. These opportunities notwithstanding, the applications of ML in nutritional epidemiology must be approached cautiously to safeguard the scientific quality of the results and provide accurate interpretations. Given the complex scenario around ML, judicious application of such tools is necessary to offer nutritional epidemiology a novel analytical resource for dietary measurement and assessment and a tool to model the complexity of dietary intake and its relation to health. This work describes the applications of ML in nutritional epidemiology and provides guidelines to avoid common pitfalls encountered in applying predictive statistical models to nutritional data. Furthermore, it helps unfamiliar readers better assess the significance of their results and provides new possible future directions in the field of ML in nutritional epidemiology.

Citing Articles

Patterns of Dietary Fatty Acids and Fat Spreads in Relation to Blood Pressure, Lipids and Insulin Resistance in Young Adults: A Repeat Cross-Sectional Study.

Woodman R, Mangoni A, Cohen-Woods S, Mori T, Beilin L, Murphy K Nutrients. 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40077737 PMC: 11901904. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050869.


Challenges for Predictive Modeling With Neural Network Techniques Using Error-Prone Dietary Intake Data.

Spicker D, Nazemi A, Hutchinson J, Fieguth P, Kirkpatrick S, Wallace M Stat Med. 2025; 44(5):e70013.

PMID: 39921576 PMC: 11806516. DOI: 10.1002/sim.70013.


Navigating next-gen nutrition care using artificial intelligence-assisted dietary assessment tools-a scoping review of potential applications.

Phalle A, Gokhale D Front Nutr. 2025; 12:1518466.

PMID: 39917741 PMC: 11798783. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1518466.


Bridging Classical Methodologies in Investigation with Modern Technologies: A Comprehensive Review.

Kitchens S, Wang C, Price S Microorganisms. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39597638 PMC: 11596670. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12112249.


Dietary intake of potassium, vitamin E, and vitamin C emerges as the most significant predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in adults.

Wang Y, Han L, Ling S, Sha Y, Sun H Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(32):e39180.

PMID: 39121250 PMC: 11315499. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039180.


References
1.
Shah N, Srivastava G, Savage D, Mago V . Assessing Canadians Health Activity and Nutritional Habits Through Social Media. Front Public Health. 2020; 7:400. PMC: 6970971. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00400. View

2.
Illner A, Freisling H, Boeing H, Huybrechts I, Crispim S, Slimani N . Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 41(4):1187-203. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys105. View

3.
Rosso N, Giabbanelli P . Accurately Inferring Compliance to Five Major Food Guidelines Through Simplified Surveys: Applying Data Mining to the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018; 4(2):e56. PMC: 6000477. DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.9536. View

4.
Kwon Y, Kim H, Jung D, Kim J . Cluster analysis of nutritional factors associated with low muscle mass index in middle-aged and older adults. Clin Nutr. 2020; 39(11):3369-3376. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.024. View

5.
Kao C, Liebovitz D . Consumer Mobile Health Apps: Current State, Barriers, and Future Directions. PM R. 2017; 9(5S):S106-S115. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.018. View