» Articles » PMID: 35564070

Cereal and Confectionary Packaging: Assessment of Sustainability and Environmental Impact with a Special Focus on Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 May 14
PMID 35564070
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The usefulness of food packaging is often questioned in the public debate about (ecological) sustainability. While worldwide packaging-related CO emissions are accountable for approximately 5% of emissions, specific packaging solutions can reach significantly higher values depending on use case and product group. Unlike other groups, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and life cycle assessment (LCA) of cereal and confectionary products have not been the focus of comprehensive reviews so far. Consequently, the present review first contextualizes packaging, sustainability and related LCA methods and then depicts how cereal and confectionary packaging has been presented in different LCA studies. The results reveal that only a few studies sufficiently include (primary, secondary and tertiary) packaging in LCAs and when they do, the focus is mainly on the direct (e.g., material used) rather than indirect environmental impacts (e.g., food losses and waste) of the like. In addition, it is shown that the packaging of cereals and confectionary contributes on average 9.18% to GHG emissions of the entire food packaging system. Finally, recommendations on how to improve packaging sustainability, how to better include packaging in LCAs and how to reflect this in management-related activities are displayed.

Citing Articles

A novel polysaccharide/zein conjugate as an alternative green plastic.

Tallawi M, Amrein D, Gemmecker G, Aifantis K, Drechsler K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13161.

PMID: 37573459 PMC: 10423201. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40293-4.


Frontiers on Sustainable Food Packaging.

Cruz R, Varzakas T Foods. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36673440 PMC: 9857415. DOI: 10.3390/foods12020349.

References
1.
Nette A, Wolf P, Schluter O, Meyer-Aurich A . A Comparison of Carbon Footprint and Production Cost of Different Pasta Products Based on Whole Egg and Pea Flour. Foods. 2017; 5(1). PMC: 5224564. DOI: 10.3390/foods5010017. View

2.
Slorach P, Jeswani H, Cuellar-Franca R, Azapagic A . Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 693:133516. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.322. View

3.
Bacenetti J, Cavaliere A, Falcone G, Giovenzana V, Banterle A, Guidetti R . Shelf life extension as solution for environmental impact mitigation: A case study for bakery products. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 627:997-1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.301. View

4.
Girgenti V, Peano C, Baudino C, Tecco N . From "farm to fork" strawberry system: current realities and potential innovative scenarios from life cycle assessment of non-renewable energy use and green house gas emissions. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 473-474:48-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.133. View

5.
Flysjo A . Potential for improving the carbon footprint of butter and blend products. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94(12):5833-41. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4545. View