» Articles » PMID: 35551263

Metabolomic Spectra for Phenotypic Prediction of Malting Quality in Spring Barley

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 13
PMID 35551263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated prediction of malting quality (MQ) phenotypes in different locations using metabolomic spectra, and compared the prediction ability of different models, and training population (TP) sizes. Data of five MQ traits was measured on 2667 individual plots of 564 malting spring barley lines from three years and two locations. A total of 24,018 metabolomic features (MFs) were measured on each wort sample. Two statistical models were used, a metabolomic best linear unbiased prediction (MBLUP) and a partial least squares regression (PLSR). Predictive ability within location and across locations were compared using cross-validation methods. For all traits, more than 90% of the total variance in MQ traits could be explained by MFs. The prediction accuracy increased with increasing TP size and stabilized when the TP size reached 1000. The optimal number of components considered in the PLSR models was 20. The accuracy using leave-one-line-out cross-validation ranged from 0.722 to 0.865 and using leave-one-location-out cross-validation from 0.517 to 0.817. In conclusion, the prediction accuracy of metabolomic prediction of MQ traits using MFs was high and MBLUP is better than PLSR if the training population is larger than 100. The results have significant implications for practical barley breeding for malting quality.

Citing Articles

Genomic prediction for yield and malting traits in barley using metabolomic and near-infrared spectra.

Raffo M, Sarup P, Jensen J, Guo X, Jensen J, Orabi J Theor Appl Genet. 2025; 138(1):24.

PMID: 39786601 PMC: 11717810. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04806-7.


Metabolomic-genomic prediction can improve prediction accuracy of breeding values for malting quality traits in barley.

Guo X, Sarup P, Jahoor A, Jensen J, Christensen O Genet Sel Evol. 2023; 55(1):61.

PMID: 37670243 PMC: 10478459. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00835-w.


Genetic architecture of inter-specific and -generic grass hybrids by network analysis on multi-omics data.

Bornhofen E, Fe D, Nagy I, Lenk I, Greve M, Didion T BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):213.

PMID: 37095447 PMC: 10127077. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09292-7.

References
1.
Rohde P, Kristensen T, Sarup P, Munoz J, Malmendal A . Prediction of complex phenotypes using the Drosophila melanogaster metabolome. Heredity (Edinb). 2021; 126(5):717-732. PMC: 8102504. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00404-1. View

2.
Lu W, Su X, Klein M, Lewis I, Fiehn O, Rabinowitz J . Metabolite Measurement: Pitfalls to Avoid and Practices to Follow. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017; 86:277-304. PMC: 5734093. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044952. View

3.
Rohde P, Fourie Sorensen I, Sorensen P . qgg: an R package for large-scale quantitative genetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2019; 36(8):2614-2615. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz955. View

4.
Meyer R, Steinfath M, Lisec J, Becher M, Witucka-Wall H, Torjek O . The metabolic signature related to high plant growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(11):4759-64. PMC: 1810331. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609709104. View

5.
Shi T, Zhu A, Jia J, Hu X, Chen J, Liu W . Metabolomics analysis and metabolite-agronomic trait associations using kernels of wheat (Triticum aestivum) recombinant inbred lines. Plant J. 2020; 103(1):279-292. PMC: 7383920. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14727. View