» Articles » PMID: 18852893

Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-wide Approach

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2008 Oct 15
PMID 18852893
Citations 301
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prediction of the genetic disease risk of an individual is a powerful public health tool. While predicting risk has been successful in diseases which follow simple Mendelian inheritance, it has proven challenging in complex diseases for which a large number of loci contribute to the genetic variance. The large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms now available provide new opportunities for predicting genetic risk of complex diseases with high accuracy.

Methodology/principal Findings: We have derived simple deterministic formulae to predict the accuracy of predicted genetic risk from population or case control studies using a genome-wide approach and assuming a dichotomous disease phenotype with an underlying continuous liability. We show that the prediction equations are special cases of the more general problem of predicting the accuracy of estimates of genetic values of a continuous phenotype. Our predictive equations are responsive to all parameters that affect accuracy and they are independent of allele frequency and effect distributions. Deterministic prediction errors when tested by simulation were generally small. The common link among the expressions for accuracy is that they are best summarized as the product of the ratio of number of phenotypic records per number of risk loci and the observed heritability.

Conclusions/significance: This study advances the understanding of the relative power of case control and population studies of disease. The predictions represent an upper bound of accuracy which may be achievable with improved effect estimation methods. The formulae derived will help researchers determine an appropriate sample size to attain a certain accuracy when predicting genetic risk.

Citing Articles

mmGEBLUP: an advanced genomic prediction scheme for genetic improvement of complex traits in crops through integrative analysis of major genes, polygenes, and genotype-environment interactions.

Zhang Q, Zhu T, Lin F, Fang D, Chen X, Lou X Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(1).

PMID: 39950744 PMC: 11826347. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf058.


Evaluating genomic selection and speed breeding for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat using stochastic simulations.

Nannuru V, Dieseth J, Lillemo M, Meuwissen T Mol Breed. 2025; 45(1):14.

PMID: 39803632 PMC: 11717775. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-024-01527-z.


Optimizing drought tolerance in cassava through genomic selection.

da Costa W, Bandeira E Souza M, Azevedo C, Nascimento M, Morgante C, Borel J Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1483340.

PMID: 39737377 PMC: 11683140. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1483340.


On the inverse association between the number of QTL and the trait-specific genomic relationship of a candidate to the training set.

Stricker C, Fernando R, Melchinger A, Auinger H, Schoen C Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):75.

PMID: 39673063 PMC: 11639121. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00940-4.


Accuracy of Genomic Predictions Cross Populations with Different Linkage Disequilibrium Patterns.

Jin L, Xu L, Jin H, Zhao S, Jia Y, Li J Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39596619 PMC: 11594128. DOI: 10.3390/genes15111419.


References
1.
Shriner D, Baye T, Padilla M, Zhang S, Vaughan L, Loraine A . Commonality of functional annotation: a method for prioritization of candidate genes from genome-wide linkage studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(4):e26. PMC: 2275105. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn007. View

2.
Robertson A, Lerner I . The Heritability of All-or-None Traits: Viability of Poultry. Genetics. 1949; 34(4):395-411. PMC: 1209454. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/34.4.395. View

3.
Pharoah P, Antoniou A, Bobrow M, Zimmern R, Easton D, Ponder B . Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet. 2002; 31(1):33-6. DOI: 10.1038/ng853. View

4.
Yi N, Xu S . Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics. 2008; 179(2):1045-55. PMC: 2429858. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.085589. View

5.
Solberg T, Sonesson A, Woolliams J, Meuwissen T . Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86(10):2447-54. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0010. View