» Articles » PMID: 35551218

Effects of Planted Pollinator Habitat on Pathogen Prevalence and Interspecific Detection Between Bee Species

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 13
PMID 35551218
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Shared resources can instigate pathogen spread due to large congregations of individuals in both natural and human modified resources. Of current concern is the addition of pollinator habitat in conservation efforts as it attracts bees of various species, potentially instigating interspecific sharing of pathogens. Common pathogens have been documented across a wide variety of pollinators with shared floral resources instigating their spread in some, but not all, cases. To evaluate the impact of augmented pollinator habitat on pathogen prevalence, we extracted RNA from samples of eight bee species across three families and screened these samples for nine pathogens using RT-qPCR. We found that some habitat characteristics influenced pathogen detection; however, we found no evidence that pathogen detection in one bee species was correlated with pathogen detection in another. In fact, pathogen detection was rare in wild bees. While gut parasites were detected in 6 out of the 8 species included in this study, viruses were only detected in honey bees. Further, virus detection in honey bees was low with a maximum 21% of samples testing positive for BQCV, for example. These findings suggest factors other than the habitat itself may be more critical in the dissemination of pathogens among bee species. However, we found high relative prevalence and copy number of gut parasites in some bee species which may be of concern, such as Bombus pensylvanicus. Long-term monitoring of pathogens in different bee species at augmented pollinator habitat is needed to evaluate if these patterns will change over time.

Citing Articles

Effects of study design parameters on estimates of bee abundance and richness in agroecosystems: a meta-analysis.

Levenson H, Metz B, Tarpy D Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2024; 117(2):92-106.

PMID: 38486925 PMC: 10933562. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saae001.

References
1.
Paull S, Song S, McClure K, Sackett L, Kilpatrick A, Johnson P . From superspreaders to disease hotspots: linking transmission across hosts and space. Front Ecol Environ. 2013; 10(2):75-82. PMC: 3589764. DOI: 10.1890/110111. View

2.
Sorensen A, van Beest F, Brook R . Impacts of wildlife baiting and supplemental feeding on infectious disease transmission risk: a synthesis of knowledge. Prev Vet Med. 2013; 113(4):356-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.010. View

3.
Keesing F, Holt R, Ostfeld R . Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(4):485-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00885.x. View

4.
Morandin L, Kremen C . Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecol Appl. 2013; 23(4):829-39. DOI: 10.1890/12-1051.1. View

5.
Williams N, Ward K, Pope N, Isaacs R, Wilson J, May E . Native wildflower plantings support wild bee abundance and diversity in agricultural landscapes across the United States. Ecol Appl. 2016; 25(8):2119-31. DOI: 10.1890/14-1748.1. View