Disease Where You Dine: Plant Species and Floral Traits Associated with Pathogen Transmission in Bumble Bees

Overview

Journal Ecology

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2018 Aug 30

PMID 30155907

Citations 42

Authors

Lynn S Adler

Kristen M Michaud

Stephen P Ellner

Scott H McArt

Philip C Stevenson

Rebecca E Irwin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Hotspots of disease transmission can strongly influence pathogen spread. Bee pathogens may be transmitted via shared floral use, but the role of plant species and floral trait variation in shaping transmission dynamics is almost entirely unexplored. Given the importance of pathogens for the decline of several bee species, understanding whether and how plant species and floral traits affect transmission could give us important tools for predicting which plant species may be hotspots for disease spread. We assessed variation in transmission via susceptibility (probability of infection) and mean intensity (cell count of infected bees) of the trypanosomatid gut pathogen Crithidia bombi to uninfected Bombus impatiens workers foraging on 14 plant species, and assessed the role of floral traits, bee size and foraging behavior on transmission. We also conducted a manipulative experiment to determine how the number of open flowers affected transmission on three plant species, Penstemon digitalis, Monarda didyma, and Lythrum salicaria. Plant species differed fourfold in the overall mean abundance of Crithidia in foraging bumble bees (mean including infected and uninfected bees). Across plant species, bee susceptibility and mean intensity increased with the number of reproductive structures per inflorescence (buds, flowers and fruits); smaller bees and those that foraged longer were also more susceptible. Trait-based models were as good or better than species-based models at predicting susceptibility and mean intensity based on AIC values. Surprisingly, floral size and morphology did not significantly predict transmission across species. In the manipulative experiment, more open flowers increased mean pathogen abundance fourfold in Monarda, but had no effect in the other two plant species. Our results suggest that variation among plant species, through their influence on pathogen transmission, may shape bee disease dynamics. Given widespread investment in pollinator-friendly plantings to support pollinators, understanding how plant species affect disease transmission is important for recommending plant species that optimize pollinator health.

Citing Articles

Host ecology and phylogeny shape the temporal dynamics of social bee viromes.

Doublet V, Doyle T, Carvell C, Brown M, Wilfert L Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2207.

PMID: 40044660 PMC: 11882784. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57314-7.

Parasites, parasitoids, and hive products that are potentially deleterious to wild and commercially raised bumble bees ( spp.) in North America.

Evans E, Strange J, Sadd B, Tripodi A, Figueroa L, Adams L J Pollinat Ecol. 2025; 33(3):37-53.

PMID: 39749144 PMC: 11694831. DOI: 10.26786/1920-7603(2023)710.

Endosymbionts that threaten commercially raised and wild bumble bees ( spp.).

Figueroa L, Sadd B, Tripodi A, Strange J, Colla S, Adams L J Pollinat Ecol. 2025; 33:14-36.

PMID: 39749009 PMC: 11694841. DOI: 10.26786/1920-7603(2023)713.

Species traits, landscape quality and floral resource overlap with honeybees determine virus transmission in plant-pollinator networks.

Maurer C, Schauer A, Yanez O, Neumann P, Gajda A, Paxton R Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(12):2239-2251.

PMID: 39367259 PMC: 11618065. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02555-w.

Distinct Communities and Differing Dispersal Routes in Bacteria and Fungi of Honey Bees, Honey, and Flowers.

Tiusanen M, Becker-Scarpitta A, Wirta H Microb Ecol. 2024; 87(1):100.

PMID: 39080099 PMC: 11289361. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-024-02413-z.

References

Cronin J, Welsh M, Dekkers M, Abercrombie S, Mitchell C . Host physiological phenotype explains pathogen reservoir potential. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13(10):1221-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01513.x. View

Webb C, Hoeting J, Ames G, Pyne M, Poff N . A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13(3):267-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01444.x. View

Ruiz-Gonzalez M, Bryden J, Moret Y, Reber-Funk C, Schmid-Hempel P, Brown M . Dynamic transmission, host quality, and population structure in a multihost parasite of bumblebees. Evolution. 2012; 66(10):3053-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01655.x. View

Costa J, Castro S, Loureiro J, Barrett S . Experimental insights on Darwin's cross-promotion hypothesis in tristylous purple loosestrife (). Am J Bot. 2017; 104(4):616-626. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1600408. View

Alaux C, Ducloz F, Crauser D, Conte Y . Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol Lett. 2010; 6(4):562-5. PMC: 2936196. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0986. View

Montgomery B, Rathcke B . Effects of floral restrictiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community. Oecologia. 2011; 168(2):449-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2094-x. View

Koch H, Brown M, Stevenson P . The role of disease in bee foraging ecology. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017; 21:60-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.008. View

McArt S, Koch H, Irwin R, Adler L . Arranging the bouquet of disease: floral traits and the transmission of plant and animal pathogens. Ecol Lett. 2014; 17(5):624-36. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12257. View

Furst M, McMahon D, Osborne J, Paxton R, Brown M . Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators. Nature. 2014; 506(7488):364-6. PMC: 3985068. DOI: 10.1038/nature12977. View

10.

Paull S, Song S, McClure K, Sackett L, Kilpatrick A, Johnson P . From superspreaders to disease hotspots: linking transmission across hosts and space. Front Ecol Environ. 2013; 10(2):75-82. PMC: 3589764. DOI: 10.1890/110111. View

11.

McMahon D, Furst M, Caspar J, Theodorou P, Brown M, Paxton R . A sting in the spit: widespread cross-infection of multiple RNA viruses across wild and managed bees. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 84(3):615-624. PMC: 4832299. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12345. View

12.

Westoby M, Wright I . Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(5):261-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.004. View

13.

Otterstatter M, Thomson J . Within-host dynamics of an intestinal pathogen of bumble bees. Parasitology. 2006; 133(Pt 6):749-61. DOI: 10.1017/S003118200600120X. View

14.

Spira W, Huq A, Ahmed Q, Saeed Y . Uptake of Vibrio cholerae biotype eltor from contaminated water by water hyacinth (eichornia crassipes). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981; 42(3):550-3. PMC: 244054. DOI: 10.1128/aem.42.3.550-553.1981. View

15.

Gamboa V, Ravoet J, Brunain M, Smagghe G, Meeus I, Figueroa J . Bee pathogens found in Bombus atratus from Colombia: A case study. J Invertebr Pathol. 2015; 129:36-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.05.013. View

16.

Graystock P, Blane E, McFrederick Q, Goulson D, Hughes W . Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2017; 5(1):64-75. PMC: 5439461. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.10.001. View

17.

Gegear R, Otterstatter M, Thomson J . Bumble-bee foragers infected by a gut parasite have an impaired ability to utilize floral information. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1590):1073-8. PMC: 1560267. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3423. View

18.

Han B, Schmidt J, Bowden S, Drake J . Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(22):7039-44. PMC: 4460448. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501598112. View

19.

Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botias C, Rotheray E . Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science. 2015; 347(6229):1255957. DOI: 10.1126/science.1255957. View

20.

Singh R, Levitt A, Rajotte E, Holmes E, Ostiguy N, vanEngelsdorp D . RNA viruses in hymenopteran pollinators: evidence of inter-Taxa virus transmission via pollen and potential impact on non-Apis hymenopteran species. PLoS One. 2011; 5(12):e14357. PMC: 3008715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014357. View