» Articles » PMID: 35549679

Convolutional Neural Network-based System for Endocytoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Background: Endocytoscopy (ECS) aids early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosis by visualization of cells. However, it is difficult for non-experts to accurately diagnose EGC using ECS. In this study, we developed and evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based system for ECS-aided EGC diagnosis.

Methods: We constructed a CNN based on a residual neural network with a training dataset comprising 906 images from 61 EGC cases and 717 images from 65 noncancerous gastric mucosa (NGM) cases. To evaluate diagnostic ability, we used an independent test dataset comprising 313 images from 39 EGC cases and 235 images from 33 NGM cases. The test dataset was further evaluated by three endoscopists, and their findings were compared with CNN-based results.

Results: The trained CNN required 7.0 s to analyze the test dataset. The area under the curve of the total ECS images was 0.93. The CNN produced 18 false positives from 7 NGM lesions and 74 false negatives from 28 EGC lesions. In the per-image analysis, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 83.2%, 76.4%, 92.3%, 93.0%, and 74.6%, respectively, with the CNN and 76.8%, 73.4%, 81.3%, 83.9%, and 69.6%, respectively, for the endoscopist-derived values. The CNN-based findings had significantly higher specificity than the findings determined by all endoscopists. In the per-lesion analysis, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the CNN-based findings were 86.1%, 82.1%, 90.9%, 91.4%, and 81.1%, respectively, and those of the results calculated by the endoscopists were 82.4%, 79.5%, 85.9%, 86.9%, and 78.0%, respectively.

Conclusions: Compared with three endoscopists, our CNN for ECS demonstrated higher specificity for EGC diagnosis. Using the CNN in ECS-based EGC diagnosis may improve the diagnostic performance of endoscopists.

Citing Articles

The value of machine learning approaches in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shi Y, Fan H, Li L, Hou Y, Qian F, Zhuang M World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):40.

PMID: 38297303 PMC: 10832162. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03321-9.


Endoscopic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Pre-Neoplastic Conditions of the Stomach.

Martins B, Moura R, Kum A, Matsubayashi C, Barbosa Marques S, Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37173912 PMC: 10177554. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092445.


Global research trends of endoscope in early gastric cancer: A bibliometric and visualized analysis study over past 20 years.

Liu S, Zhang N, Hao Y, Li P Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1068747.

PMID: 37091163 PMC: 10118158. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1068747.

References
1.
Luo H, Xu G, Li C, He L, Luo L, Wang Z . Real-time artificial intelligence for detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer by endoscopy: a multicentre, case-control, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(12):1645-1654. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30637-0. View

2.
. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2016; 20(1):1-19. PMC: 5215069. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. View

3.
Li L, Chen Y, Shen Z, Zhang X, Sang J, Ding Y . Convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer based on magnifying narrow band imaging. Gastric Cancer. 2019; 23(1):126-132. PMC: 6942561. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00992-2. View

4.
El Hajjar A, Rey J . Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: general overview. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020; 133(3):326-334. PMC: 7004609. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000623. View

5.
Fujimoto K, Fujishiro M, Kato M, Higuchi K, Iwakiri R, Sakamoto C . Guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. Dig Endosc. 2013; 26(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1111/den.12183. View