» Articles » PMID: 35543895

Systematic Review and Pharmacokinetic Meta-analysis of Doxorubicin Exposure in Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Doxorubicin-Eluted Beads Chemoembolization for Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Date 2022 May 11
PMID 35543895
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Almost 15 years after the introduction of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy, the mean peak plasma concentration (C) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for doxorubicin have still not been systematically reviewed or meta-analyzed.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data and establish a reference range for C and AUC of doxorubicin DEB-TACE and TACE, as well as explore the potential influence of microspheres' size and type on these parameters.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from August 1992 through December 2021. Studies measuring exposure parameters among HCC patients treated with doxorubicin DEB-TACE without restriction on language were included. Two independent reviewers extracted and unified data sets for pooled estimate analysis. The quality of the evidence was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The ClinPK Statement checklist and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to determine the quality of studies.

Results: Out of 666 studies, 246 full-text were reviewed, and 8 studies entered the meta-analysis (120 patients). C and AUC of doxorubicin were 7.52-fold (95% CI 7.65 to 7.42-fold; P < 0.0001) and 1.91-fold (95% CI 1.95 to 1.88-fold; P = 0.0001) lower with DEB-TACE compared to TACE. Significant reduction in pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of C and AUC was observed with DEB-TACE versus TACE in direct comparison analysis (- 2.93; 95% CI - 3.60 to - 2.26, P < 0.00001, and - 1.73 95% CI - 2.55 to - 0.91, P < 0.0001, respectively). Moreover, in DEB-TACE stratification analysis, small microspheres revealed higher C, AUC and tumor response rate as well as lower complication rate.

Limitation: The heterogeneity could not be completely addressed through sensitivity and stratification analysis.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides exposure parameters of doxorubicin and justifies the advantage of DEB-TACE over TACE in terms of safety for patients with unresectable HCC. This study showed a marked association between the size of microsphere and exposure parameters of doxorubicin supporting the preference for small microspheres in DEB-TACE. The moderate and low quality of evidence is assigned to the C and AUC, respectively.

Citing Articles

Integrating CT Radiomics and Clinical Features to Optimize TACE Technique Decision-Making in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Masthoff M, Irle M, Kaldewey D, Rennebaum F, Morgul H, Pohler G Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075740 PMC: 11899091. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050893.


Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone, gentamicin, meropenem and vancomycin in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review.

Comce M, Weersink R, Beuers U, van Hest R, Lantinga M J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024; 79(11):2750-2761.

PMID: 39289819 PMC: 11531807. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae310.


Safety, efficacy, and survival of different transarterial chemoembolization techniques in the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative single-center analysis.

Schindler P, Kaldewey D, Rennebaum F, Trebicka J, Pascher A, Wildgruber M J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(5):235.

PMID: 38710956 PMC: 11074216. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05722-5.


Transarterial Chemoembolization with Epirubicin-Loaded Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study (STOPPER Trial).

Zhu H, Li X, Sun J, Zhu X, Liu Z, Li H Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47(3):325-336.

PMID: 38413420 PMC: 10920424. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03666-4.


Comparison of the Treatment Response of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Adel H, Shazlee M, Qamar S, Hyder S, Razaque A Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41701.

PMID: 37575777 PMC: 10414135. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41701.

References
1.
Bosch F, Ribes J, Diaz M, Cleries R . Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127(5 Suppl 1):S5-S16. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.011. View

2.
Llovet J, Bruix J . Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003; 37(2):429-42. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047. View

3.
Tewey K, Rowe T, Yang L, Halligan B, Liu L . Adriamycin-induced DNA damage mediated by mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. Science. 1984; 226(4673):466-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.6093249. View

4.
King P, Perry M . Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2001; 6(2):162-76. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-2-162. View

5.
Ohishi H, Uchida H, Yoshimura H, Ohue S, Ueda J, Katsuragi M . Hepatocellular carcinoma detected by iodized oil. Use of anticancer agents. Radiology. 1985; 154(1):25-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.154.1.2981114. View