» Articles » PMID: 35525913

A Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Lenvatinib As Initial Treatment in Patients with BCLC-defined Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] B). However, it often leads to a poor prognosis and decreased hepatic function especially in patients with BCLC substage B2. Lenvatinib (LEN) was demonstrated to be efficacious in these patients in the REFLECT phase 3 trial. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEN as a first-line treatment for the patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2.

Methods: This prospective observational study used LEN in TACE-naïve patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2 and preserved hepatic function. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A one-year survival rate threshold of 60% and an expected survival rate of 78%, based on previous reports of TACE, was assumed for setting the sample size. With a one-sided α-type error of 5% and 70% detection power, 25 patients were required over a 2-year enrollment period and 10-month follow-up period.

Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study from June 2018 to June 2020. The 1-year survival rate was 71.0% (90% confidence interval, 68.4-73.6%). Median overall and progression-free survival periods were 17.0 and 10.4 months, and the objective response rates according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST criteria were 22.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (68%), hypertension (65%), anorexia (61%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (39%), and thrombocytopenia (32%) of any grade; aspartate aminotransferase increased (23%), alanine aminotransferase increased (16%), and grade ≥ 3 proteinuria (13%). Treatment interruption and dose reduction were required in 61% and 81% of patients, respectively. LEN was discontinued in 29 patients due to disease progression (n = 17), AEs (n = 9), conversion to curative treatments (n = 2), and sudden death (n = 1), whereas post-LEN treatments were administered in 18 patients, including systemic chemotherapy (n = 11), TACE (n = 6), transarterial infusion (n = 1) and clinical trial (n = 1).

Conclusions: The results suggest that LEN provides treatment benefits as an initial therapeutic in patients with BCLC substage B2 HCC with a safety profile comparable to that previously reported.

Citing Articles

Systemic Treatment in Intermediate Stage (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Karagiannakis D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201479 PMC: 10778557. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010051.


Clinical Effect of Lenvatinib Re-Administration after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Intermediate Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Mawatari S, Tamai T, Kumagai K, Saisyoji A, Muromachi K, Toyodome A Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(24).

PMID: 36551623 PMC: 9776720. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246139.


Lenvatinib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wang S, Wang Y, Yu J, Wu H, Zhou Y Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(22).

PMID: 36428618 PMC: 9688932. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225525.


Ideal patients for liver resection in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer or Hong Kong Liver clinic systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Conservative or aggressive?.

Li J, Zhou P, Chang D, Tong Y, Bao Y, Xiao Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:977135.

PMID: 36314035 PMC: 9614110. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.977135.


Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A review.

Sun L, Xu X, Meng F, Liu Q, Wang H, Li X Front Oncol. 2022; 12:980214.

PMID: 36249023 PMC: 9555078. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980214.

References
1.
Schoenfeld D, Richter J . Nomograms for calculating the number of patients needed for a clinical trial with survival as an endpoint. Biometrics. 1982; 38(1):163-70. View

2.
Balogh J, Victor 3rd D, Asham E, Burroughs S, Boktour M, Saharia A . Hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2016; 3:41-53. PMC: 5063561. DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S61146. View

3.
Meyer T, Fox R, Ma Y, Ross P, James M, Sturgess R . Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (TACE 2): a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2(8):565-575. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30156-5. View

4.
Kudo M, Finn R, Qin S, Han K, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F . Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 391(10126):1163-1173. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1. View

5.
Fung A, Tam V, Meyers D, Sim H, Knox J, Zaborska V . Second-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib: Characterizing treatments used over the past 10 years and real-world eligibility for cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab. Cancer Med. 2020; 9(13):4640-4647. PMC: 7333842. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3116. View