» Articles » PMID: 35520393

Brave New E-world: Medical Students' Preferences for and Usage of Electronic Learning Resources During Two Different Phases of Their Education

Overview
Journal FASEB Bioadv
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35520393
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

E-learning strategies have become an important part of biomedical education. However, why and how medical students select hardware tools and software formats during their preclinical education has not been sufficiently evaluated. These aspects should be considered when designing or offering new e-learning modalities to learners. Two medical school classes at a major US medical school were surveyed about their use of e-learning resources during their first year of medical school or their preparation for their first licensing examination (USMLE® Step 1), respectively. Their responses were analyzed for patterns and significant changes. Students' answers indicated that computers and tablets were considered the most important hardware devices to support students' learning. During the first year, students often preferred resources that were tailored to the specific courses in their curriculum. In contrast, some preferences changed when students prepared for the USMLE Step 1, with students shifting almost exclusively to a solitary learning strategy using commercial e-learning resources. Across all phases of medical school education queried, peer advice was the major determinant influencing e-learning resource selection with faculty only playing a minor role. Videos were the most popular e-learning modality, and students cited efficient acquisition of knowledge and preparation for examinations as major reasons for e-learning tool utilization. These factors should be considered when offering e-learning resources to medical students during different phases of their preclinical training.

Citing Articles

The Double-Edged Sword of Third-Party Resources: Examining Use and Financial Burden of Extracurricular Tools in Medical Students.

Farhan S, Kienzle D, Guler M, Siddique F, Fernandez A, Papanagnou D MedEdPublish (2016). 2025; 14():4.

PMID: 39803636 PMC: 11724203. DOI: 10.12688/mep.20120.2.


Unlocking Medical Student Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Third-Party Resources Used for Medical Education and USMLE Board Preparation.

Kann M, Huang G, Pugazenthi S, Kann R, Chen D, Hardi A Med Sci Educ. 2025; 34(6):1603-1622.

PMID: 39758474 PMC: 11699012. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02116-7.


Spaced Digital Education for Health Professionals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Martinengo L, Ng M, Ng T, Ang Y, Jabir A, Kyaw B J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e57760.

PMID: 39388234 PMC: 11502984. DOI: 10.2196/57760.


Design and Implementation of a Brief, Self-Directed Course on Immunotherapy Best Practices for Neurology Trainees.

Blackburn K, Sguigna P, Tardo L, Khan S, Vernino S, Phillips L J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024; 11:23821205241271546.

PMID: 39130679 PMC: 11311178. DOI: 10.1177/23821205241271546.


Implementing PathElective as an organized means of supplementing pathology education in an osteopathic medical school-the New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine experience.

Plummer M, Mirza K, Lilley C, Eng N Acad Pathol. 2024; 11(2):100122.

PMID: 38812825 PMC: 11134534. DOI: 10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100122.


References
1.
Hortsch M . "How we learn may not always be good for us" - Do new electronic teaching approaches always result in better learning outcomes?. Med Teach. 2015; 37(6):507-9. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.1001341. View

2.
Mangold K . Educating a new generation: teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students. Nurse Educ. 2007; 32(1):21-3. DOI: 10.1097/00006223-200701000-00007. View

3.
Johnson S, Purkiss J, Holaday L, Selvig D, Hortsch M . Learning histology - dental and medical students' study strategies. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014; 19(2):65-73. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12104. View

4.
Zureick A, Burk-Rafel J, Purkiss J, Hortsch M . The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2017; 11(4):366-376. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1754. View

5.
Karic B, Moino V, Nolin A, Andrews A, Brisson P . Evaluation of surgical educational videos available for third year medical students. Med Educ Online. 2020; 25(1):1714197. PMC: 6968551. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714197. View